Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
A bit of a moral dilema ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hound dog" data-source="post: 464427" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>Hmm. </p><p></p><p>Let's try this another way.</p><p></p><p>Let's say you paid them 31.00 in cash. You got your receipt. They get robbed. That 31.00 in cash is taken with everything else. </p><p></p><p>Now, do you still feel obligated to pay them? Because if you did, you'd be paying 62.00, instead of the 31.00, for their negligence in have the brains enough to deposit their funds in the bank each day.</p><p></p><p>It's the same thing, even though your check has yet to be cashed. </p><p></p><p>There is a reason you get a paid stamp on your bill. </p><p></p><p>That money/checks were stolen because it was available for someone to steal, responsible establishments don't leave money locked even in a safe overnight. Once you handed that check over to them it became their responsibility, in effect at that point it became their money. Know what I mean??</p><p></p><p>If the same scene happened with a store, would you feel the same way?</p><p></p><p>Stinks that such a thing happened. I hope they change how they do things. That was just asking someone to do what they did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hound dog, post: 464427, member: 84"] Hmm. Let's try this another way. Let's say you paid them 31.00 in cash. You got your receipt. They get robbed. That 31.00 in cash is taken with everything else. Now, do you still feel obligated to pay them? Because if you did, you'd be paying 62.00, instead of the 31.00, for their negligence in have the brains enough to deposit their funds in the bank each day. It's the same thing, even though your check has yet to be cashed. There is a reason you get a paid stamp on your bill. That money/checks were stolen because it was available for someone to steal, responsible establishments don't leave money locked even in a safe overnight. Once you handed that check over to them it became their responsibility, in effect at that point it became their money. Know what I mean?? If the same scene happened with a store, would you feel the same way? Stinks that such a thing happened. I hope they change how they do things. That was just asking someone to do what they did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
A bit of a moral dilema ...
Top