Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Advocate, IEP meeting, MAP testing, and such...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="helpme" data-source="post: 352019" data-attributes="member: 8202"><p>>I take it they have no other plans for Wee during testing? </p><p></p><p>Okay, maybe I'm totally off base here, but does your SD have RTI for his age level?</p><p>Because we (at 6th grade) landed in RTI due to results of MAP testing. To me (in </p><p>dealing with teams and all), it seems like 75% of the kids fell into RTI (Response </p><p>To Intervention). Shhhhhhh...maybe it's the teaching that's the problem? </p><p></p><p>And onward....my current argument is ESY (extended school year) placement.</p><p>Everyone's insisting that there must be a "show of regression or a difficulty with</p><p>retention". We already have more accommodations without an IEP, but I could</p><p>care less about that now. By next year they will be begging me to sign an IEP.</p><p>been there done that. But don't worry about my arguments, I'll win my battles anywho.</p><p></p><p>But maybe it's something for you to think about. I have seen parents who</p><p>struggled with schedules and they even fought down to the amount of schooling</p><p>the child received, thereby creating a longer school year in some shape or form.</p><p>I mean really, they percentagize all of their Special Education minutes and all, why not</p><p>make sure they allocate GIVING that amount to your child. Um, or maybe </p><p>you aren't to that point in the whatever they call it now IEP process<?></p><p></p><p>I know the lines are shady here of eligibility and non eligibilty and all, but it was</p><p>my understanding that a low test result put them into RTI regardless of IEP or</p><p>eligibility requirements. Some parents around here got very upset with that "rule"</p><p>for their PCs. Furthermore, RTI was dependent upon the class that</p><p>showed a low test result. So for us, kids cannot attend a RTI for math unless</p><p>they received a low test score or had an accommodation in place through 504</p><p>or IEP. I believe we were told that this ensures the minimal amount of children</p><p>in attendance for each RTI category.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="helpme, post: 352019, member: 8202"] >I take it they have no other plans for Wee during testing? Okay, maybe I'm totally off base here, but does your SD have RTI for his age level? Because we (at 6th grade) landed in RTI due to results of MAP testing. To me (in dealing with teams and all), it seems like 75% of the kids fell into RTI (Response To Intervention). Shhhhhhh...maybe it's the teaching that's the problem? And onward....my current argument is ESY (extended school year) placement. Everyone's insisting that there must be a "show of regression or a difficulty with retention". We already have more accommodations without an IEP, but I could care less about that now. By next year they will be begging me to sign an IEP. been there done that. But don't worry about my arguments, I'll win my battles anywho. But maybe it's something for you to think about. I have seen parents who struggled with schedules and they even fought down to the amount of schooling the child received, thereby creating a longer school year in some shape or form. I mean really, they percentagize all of their Special Education minutes and all, why not make sure they allocate GIVING that amount to your child. Um, or maybe you aren't to that point in the whatever they call it now IEP process<?> I know the lines are shady here of eligibility and non eligibilty and all, but it was my understanding that a low test result put them into RTI regardless of IEP or eligibility requirements. Some parents around here got very upset with that "rule" for their PCs. Furthermore, RTI was dependent upon the class that showed a low test result. So for us, kids cannot attend a RTI for math unless they received a low test score or had an accommodation in place through 504 or IEP. I believe we were told that this ensures the minimal amount of children in attendance for each RTI category. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Advocate, IEP meeting, MAP testing, and such...
Top