Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
And now...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shari" data-source="post: 265705" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p>I agree. But they also had input from the private school that had staff that could do the same - he had one teacher there that NEVER had an issue with difficult child. NEVER. SpEd teacher can do the same if she works 1:1 with difficult child. The one para has <em>very few </em>problems. The other para, last I knew, was a ticking time bomb. Pretty boy's latest take is that the transition from pricate school to here was too much for difficult child. I want to add to certain personnel's ability to make him succeed in private school. Only I'm pulling it off in public school.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Pretty boy doesn't want me there. SpEd teacher and SpEd director pushed for this, since they don't have staff (I think due to pretty boy) that can work with difficult child. Pretty boy adamantly, so far, will not allow a dedicated 1:1 for difficult child.</p><p> </p><p>The original intent was to transition him into the afternoon, train a para, and hand it off. I know that this plan has changed, in their eyes. I don't plan for it to change.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>SpEd director has been involved in every IEP meeting already. Its a smaller school. <em>I</em> asked for alternatives to me going to school with him. <em>I </em>asked for input on who thought mediocre para could handle difficult child if he came back in the afternoon (not one person responded) and she was his para. There was no plan, and I asked for one, and my suggestion (me going in and training a para) was the only one put on the table.</p><p> </p><p>I think I'm in good with SpEd director. difficult child 1 was a difficult child, and SpEd Director has always commended me for the way I advocate for and handle my kids with regards to school, even tho we muddled thru without an IEP for him. So I think I have just a tad of respect there, and I sure don't want to use it or lose it or rely on it, but it does help.</p><p> </p><p>So anyway, am I way off base?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shari, post: 265705, member: 1848"] I agree. But they also had input from the private school that had staff that could do the same - he had one teacher there that NEVER had an issue with difficult child. NEVER. SpEd teacher can do the same if she works 1:1 with difficult child. The one para has [I]very few [/I]problems. The other para, last I knew, was a ticking time bomb. Pretty boy's latest take is that the transition from pricate school to here was too much for difficult child. I want to add to certain personnel's ability to make him succeed in private school. Only I'm pulling it off in public school. Pretty boy doesn't want me there. SpEd teacher and SpEd director pushed for this, since they don't have staff (I think due to pretty boy) that can work with difficult child. Pretty boy adamantly, so far, will not allow a dedicated 1:1 for difficult child. The original intent was to transition him into the afternoon, train a para, and hand it off. I know that this plan has changed, in their eyes. I don't plan for it to change. SpEd director has been involved in every IEP meeting already. Its a smaller school. [I]I[/I] asked for alternatives to me going to school with him. [I]I [/I]asked for input on who thought mediocre para could handle difficult child if he came back in the afternoon (not one person responded) and she was his para. There was no plan, and I asked for one, and my suggestion (me going in and training a para) was the only one put on the table. I think I'm in good with SpEd director. difficult child 1 was a difficult child, and SpEd Director has always commended me for the way I advocate for and handle my kids with regards to school, even tho we muddled thru without an IEP for him. So I think I have just a tad of respect there, and I sure don't want to use it or lose it or rely on it, but it does help. So anyway, am I way off base? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
And now...
Top