Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Another "non-political" issue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 285109" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>Andy makes a good point I hadn't thought of, about the association being with the store owner as a possibility.</p><p></p><p>As far as judges working with other judges, that one doesn't add up to me because the father of the daughter is a supreme court judge- meaning he gets cases fromo all over the state. They would have to get someone from outside the state to get out of his jurisdiction and I don't think they can do that.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I personally wouldn't have thought anything about it if a "typical" judge had heard the case as long as the daughter got a typical sentence. I understand about recusing themselves for personal knowledge though- difficult child's arraigning judge said he could never actually hear difficult child's trial portion of a case because they have a mutual connection, and that made sense. He told everyone so there would be no question about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 285109, member: 3699"] Andy makes a good point I hadn't thought of, about the association being with the store owner as a possibility. As far as judges working with other judges, that one doesn't add up to me because the father of the daughter is a supreme court judge- meaning he gets cases fromo all over the state. They would have to get someone from outside the state to get out of his jurisdiction and I don't think they can do that. Anyway, I personally wouldn't have thought anything about it if a "typical" judge had heard the case as long as the daughter got a typical sentence. I understand about recusing themselves for personal knowledge though- difficult child's arraigning judge said he could never actually hear difficult child's trial portion of a case because they have a mutual connection, and that made sense. He told everyone so there would be no question about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Another "non-political" issue
Top