Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 445423" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>And who's going to pay for Casey's escape? Does anyone know?</p><p></p><p>Back to that, DJ, the way I look at it is that one juror said they "considered" (well, they never went back and reviewed it) each individual evidence like the duct tape, etc, and just looking at that, they decided it could mean anything. Yeah, if I just look at a piece of old duct tape it could mean anything to me too. However, if I look at that in Caylee's situation, along with the next thing- say that Caylee was 2yo and in the care of her mother, then the video of Casey with her boyfriend in a store that very night, etc......yeah, by themselves that means nothing, but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to connect the dots. So, were they inable to connect the dots or did they think if they did that themselves, it meant the prosecution hadn't proven it? Or, hoenstly, I still can't help but think that maybe they just didn't want to put the time and effort into real review of evidence and deliberating to hammer it out. What is it exactly that they didn't get? I just can't believe that they really got all that and came to this conclusion when they say their intial votes were split between guilt and innocence yet no evidence was reviewed and they were out the next day. That just looks like the people who thought she was guilty didn't want to bother trying and just gave in to the others to get out of there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 445423, member: 3699"] And who's going to pay for Casey's escape? Does anyone know? Back to that, DJ, the way I look at it is that one juror said they "considered" (well, they never went back and reviewed it) each individual evidence like the duct tape, etc, and just looking at that, they decided it could mean anything. Yeah, if I just look at a piece of old duct tape it could mean anything to me too. However, if I look at that in Caylee's situation, along with the next thing- say that Caylee was 2yo and in the care of her mother, then the video of Casey with her boyfriend in a store that very night, etc......yeah, by themselves that means nothing, but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to connect the dots. So, were they inable to connect the dots or did they think if they did that themselves, it meant the prosecution hadn't proven it? Or, hoenstly, I still can't help but think that maybe they just didn't want to put the time and effort into real review of evidence and deliberating to hammer it out. What is it exactly that they didn't get? I just can't believe that they really got all that and came to this conclusion when they say their intial votes were split between guilt and innocence yet no evidence was reviewed and they were out the next day. That just looks like the people who thought she was guilty didn't want to bother trying and just gave in to the others to get out of there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
Top