Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nancy" data-source="post: 445569" data-attributes="member: 59"><p>You know I have been trying to distance myself from this case too but I can't. Every day something else comes up that just makes me angry all over. I agree with everything you said klmno. I said all along that unless those jurors had difficult child's at home they had no idea what family dynamics come into play and so for them they think the family is dysfunctional, ergo Casey's behavior is understandable, instead of that Casey is dysfuntional and the family is just trying to survive.</p><p></p><p>I keep hearing how intelligent Casey is and that she does not have any psychological impairment and I shake my head. That must mean my difficult child, and all of our difficult child's, are fine and their behavior is nothing strange and we must be the crazy ones who cause the dysfunction. How can you have a person who lies about EVERYTHING and shows no normal emotions of fear, loss, guilt and who acts out the way she did after her daughter died, who took no responsibility for her daughter, how does someone do that and be declared to have no psychological impairment??? I'm questioning whether these psychologists have any clue about people. How do they know she is telling them the truth and not conning them? My difficult child conned so many psychologists that I would have to call them after the session to let them know all the lies she told. And several of them told me point blank they had no idea she was lying. Isn't there something wrong with that? Unless she tells these psychologists the truth and tells them she is lying to all the rest of us, how can they believe anything she says?</p><p></p><p>I too have tried to understand the jurors. I listen to what they say and each one says something different and none of them can explain to me how they looked at the evidence and come to a reasonable conclusion. They just dismiss the fact that it was a circumstantial case and they didn't need to have the manner of death, they just ignore that. You know some of our difficult child's have received tougher sentences for far less crimes.</p><p></p><p>Things keep popping into my head about this and none of it makes any sense to me.</p><p></p><p>Nancy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nancy, post: 445569, member: 59"] You know I have been trying to distance myself from this case too but I can't. Every day something else comes up that just makes me angry all over. I agree with everything you said klmno. I said all along that unless those jurors had difficult child's at home they had no idea what family dynamics come into play and so for them they think the family is dysfunctional, ergo Casey's behavior is understandable, instead of that Casey is dysfuntional and the family is just trying to survive. I keep hearing how intelligent Casey is and that she does not have any psychological impairment and I shake my head. That must mean my difficult child, and all of our difficult child's, are fine and their behavior is nothing strange and we must be the crazy ones who cause the dysfunction. How can you have a person who lies about EVERYTHING and shows no normal emotions of fear, loss, guilt and who acts out the way she did after her daughter died, who took no responsibility for her daughter, how does someone do that and be declared to have no psychological impairment??? I'm questioning whether these psychologists have any clue about people. How do they know she is telling them the truth and not conning them? My difficult child conned so many psychologists that I would have to call them after the session to let them know all the lies she told. And several of them told me point blank they had no idea she was lying. Isn't there something wrong with that? Unless she tells these psychologists the truth and tells them she is lying to all the rest of us, how can they believe anything she says? I too have tried to understand the jurors. I listen to what they say and each one says something different and none of them can explain to me how they looked at the evidence and come to a reasonable conclusion. They just dismiss the fact that it was a circumstantial case and they didn't need to have the manner of death, they just ignore that. You know some of our difficult child's have received tougher sentences for far less crimes. Things keep popping into my head about this and none of it makes any sense to me. Nancy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
Top