Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mattsmom277" data-source="post: 445690" data-attributes="member: 4264"><p>So over trying to figure out the CMA case. It's confusing and so emotional based, for good reason. It's just sad <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" />.</p><p></p><p>Regarding juries and evidence and reasonable doubt: I'm sure hoping that if my bio donor doesn't plead guilty that he chooses a jury trial and that I get people who understand beyond a reasonable doubt. Considering we have NO forensics, just a 40+ year history of major sexual abuse involving over a dozen known (other reluctant or unknowns) victims who at the time of offenses did not know each other and had no idea he had a history. Thus, common sense, total strangers don't somehow find each other and several generations of women just decide to point a finger. Common sense hopefully will turn up in the juries mind when the shrinks and therapists for all of us that we saw through the years testify to our work with them regarding the abuse. If I get a jury unwilling to look past forensics, one of Canada's worst sex offenders will be free to rape and molest more young women. The one thing we all know, he will never stop unless locked up or dead. </p><p></p><p>I'm curious about peoples opinions on the jury makeup and thought process in the CMA case to see if it is common approach to analyzing facts in deliberations, perhaps some insight into what to expect soon enough in a court room near to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mattsmom277, post: 445690, member: 4264"] So over trying to figure out the CMA case. It's confusing and so emotional based, for good reason. It's just sad :(. Regarding juries and evidence and reasonable doubt: I'm sure hoping that if my bio donor doesn't plead guilty that he chooses a jury trial and that I get people who understand beyond a reasonable doubt. Considering we have NO forensics, just a 40+ year history of major sexual abuse involving over a dozen known (other reluctant or unknowns) victims who at the time of offenses did not know each other and had no idea he had a history. Thus, common sense, total strangers don't somehow find each other and several generations of women just decide to point a finger. Common sense hopefully will turn up in the juries mind when the shrinks and therapists for all of us that we saw through the years testify to our work with them regarding the abuse. If I get a jury unwilling to look past forensics, one of Canada's worst sex offenders will be free to rape and molest more young women. The one thing we all know, he will never stop unless locked up or dead. I'm curious about peoples opinions on the jury makeup and thought process in the CMA case to see if it is common approach to analyzing facts in deliberations, perhaps some insight into what to expect soon enough in a court room near to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
Top