Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donna723" data-source="post: 445699" data-attributes="member: 1883"><p>I think it's that "common sense" thing that really bothers me the most! Good old common sense should tell anybody that she killed that baby! What other logical explanation could there possibly be? Nothing else makes any sense at all. I watched just about every minute of that trial and I never saw one single thing that made me think it was anything other than cold blooded, calculated murder! And they discounted <u>everything</u> that George Anthony said because he may have stretched the truth about his relationship with that goofy woman! I thought that was understandable and forgivable, seeing as how his wife was sitting right there in the courtroom. I found the rest of his testmony to be very believable. The jury may have had the wrong impression about the circumstantial evidence and may have thought they needed hard evidence like DNA for a conviction. And where did they get the idea that they had to have an exact cause of death to be able to reach a Guilty verdict? The medical examiner ruled it a homicide. Did they not listen when it was explained to them? Why didn't they ask any questions? They couldn't possibly have gone over all that evidence in such a short time. I still get the impression that they rushed through it, didn't bother to ask questions to clarify things they weren't sure of, they were all in a hurry to get out of there, and it may have been the idea of one person and the rest just went along to be done with it so they could go home.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donna723, post: 445699, member: 1883"] I think it's that "common sense" thing that really bothers me the most! Good old common sense should tell anybody that she killed that baby! What other logical explanation could there possibly be? Nothing else makes any sense at all. I watched just about every minute of that trial and I never saw one single thing that made me think it was anything other than cold blooded, calculated murder! And they discounted [U]everything[/U] that George Anthony said because he may have stretched the truth about his relationship with that goofy woman! I thought that was understandable and forgivable, seeing as how his wife was sitting right there in the courtroom. I found the rest of his testmony to be very believable. The jury may have had the wrong impression about the circumstantial evidence and may have thought they needed hard evidence like DNA for a conviction. And where did they get the idea that they had to have an exact cause of death to be able to reach a Guilty verdict? The medical examiner ruled it a homicide. Did they not listen when it was explained to them? Why didn't they ask any questions? They couldn't possibly have gone over all that evidence in such a short time. I still get the impression that they rushed through it, didn't bother to ask questions to clarify things they weren't sure of, they were all in a hurry to get out of there, and it may have been the idea of one person and the rest just went along to be done with it so they could go home. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Back to CMA issues....
Top