N
Nomad
Guest
No doubt that attorneys play certain kind of "games," that fall just within the legal limits.
Look at the sentencing for CA. The judge himself did not know that the defense was going to ask that her charges be combined into one charge. Why? 'Cause the legal team gave the clerk the information the night before and just happened to forget to tell the clerk that the judge needed this information and the prosecution didn't have it either and then the judge and prosecution had to do everything on the fly and in front of cameras as well. Can't prove anything...but this is what likely happened. Not illegal either....but just short of illegal and then again, can't prove it.
Was talking with- someone today and he said that other charges should have been brought again CA so that a conviction would have been more likely. He thinks that yes, she is either guilty or at the very least, she had something to do with "something." Perhaps an accident that was covered up or "something." Well, there you have it. That is probably how the great majority of us feel as well. We feel very strongly that she did "something." After all, a child is dead and she ended up in the woods with duct tape on her mouth and she was out partying when her child was missing. It does NOT take a genuis to figure out with this information alone, that something is dreadfully sinister here. However, concrete evidence is missing and it was too confusing to get a conviction. It certainly worries me that it would be relatively easy under certain circumstances to get away with murder in this country....this case certainly implies it...and is very disturbing!
RE: the computer search....it is very very super duper suspicious to me. I suppose it is somewhat possible that CA didn't know what the word meant and saw it recently. Even one search would be a red flag for me.
I'm beginning to think....although its kind of weird thought...that maybe jury foreman...should be professionals with training and licenses.
From MWM "I was shocked when I heard the reasons the jurors gave for finding Casey not guilty. The foreman, who was only thirty, pretty much said, "Nah, it doesn't bother me that she partied the day she allegedly found out Caylee had drowned. I mean, that's what people our age do. We like to party." And he was the foreman."
(All I can say is OMG! I'm too sad to respond to that!)
I think, generally, we have to put this behind us, because it is so very depressing.
We can make a desicion to boycott any books, magazines etc. in which CA participates....might do a little good. It might help a little 'cause some advertisers might avoid her.
Maybe the only thing we can get out of this that is very positive is Caylee's Law. Anyone got any good information on the progress of that?
Look at the sentencing for CA. The judge himself did not know that the defense was going to ask that her charges be combined into one charge. Why? 'Cause the legal team gave the clerk the information the night before and just happened to forget to tell the clerk that the judge needed this information and the prosecution didn't have it either and then the judge and prosecution had to do everything on the fly and in front of cameras as well. Can't prove anything...but this is what likely happened. Not illegal either....but just short of illegal and then again, can't prove it.
Was talking with- someone today and he said that other charges should have been brought again CA so that a conviction would have been more likely. He thinks that yes, she is either guilty or at the very least, she had something to do with "something." Perhaps an accident that was covered up or "something." Well, there you have it. That is probably how the great majority of us feel as well. We feel very strongly that she did "something." After all, a child is dead and she ended up in the woods with duct tape on her mouth and she was out partying when her child was missing. It does NOT take a genuis to figure out with this information alone, that something is dreadfully sinister here. However, concrete evidence is missing and it was too confusing to get a conviction. It certainly worries me that it would be relatively easy under certain circumstances to get away with murder in this country....this case certainly implies it...and is very disturbing!
RE: the computer search....it is very very super duper suspicious to me. I suppose it is somewhat possible that CA didn't know what the word meant and saw it recently. Even one search would be a red flag for me.
I'm beginning to think....although its kind of weird thought...that maybe jury foreman...should be professionals with training and licenses.
From MWM "I was shocked when I heard the reasons the jurors gave for finding Casey not guilty. The foreman, who was only thirty, pretty much said, "Nah, it doesn't bother me that she partied the day she allegedly found out Caylee had drowned. I mean, that's what people our age do. We like to party." And he was the foreman."
(All I can say is OMG! I'm too sad to respond to that!)
I think, generally, we have to put this behind us, because it is so very depressing.
We can make a desicion to boycott any books, magazines etc. in which CA participates....might do a little good. It might help a little 'cause some advertisers might avoid her.
Maybe the only thing we can get out of this that is very positive is Caylee's Law. Anyone got any good information on the progress of that?
, no forensics were done, no interviewing of possible perpetrators. Nothing. So when they found her dead, all they time they had wasted going down this one road, meant it was too late for the forensics and a formal investigation, and they had lost all possible chances of retrieving it.
