Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Casey Anthony Bombshell!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DDD" data-source="post: 432349" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>Sorry if my post sounded like I am convinced Casey is innocent. That was not the intention. My intention was to point out that the trail by media with help from law enforcement began in 2008. I conceed that she is an immature, habitual liar with difficult child tendencies. It in Court she is proven to be the one responsible for the death of her daughter I'm not going to argue the decision.</p><p> </p><p>So far, however, I have not heard or read any statements from eye witnesses that she was a poor Mom. Even relatives say that she and her daughter consistently appeared to have a loving caring relationship. There has been no evidence that she is a boozer, has ever been a drug user nor is there evidence that she has been promiscous by today's standards. The Prosecution puts out the theory that she wanted her daughter dead so she could hook up with a guy with-o the responsibility of a child. So far I have heard that each of her boyfriends knew Casey and her daughter as a loving combo. I haven't heard yet that (Like Susan ?? Smith who drowned her little boys) she was in love with a guy who didn't want a kid. So..to me, that sounds like a sexist motivation for murder that was agreed upon by the Prosecution because they couldn't find a specific motive. They have to have a motivation for their case.</p><p> </p><p>So the point of my post was not to say she is innocent, or that the grandparents are guilty. The point was that I don't think the public should rush to judgement because of the press coverage. I am also not saying that she was a sexual abuse victim. Who knows? But that wouldn't justify murder anyway. Marg's example is a good one. That Mom was guilty as sin in the press. The Judicial process determined she wasn't. </p><p> </p><p>I can't remember which CD family member said that she hated to see rancor among the family. I apologize if that is how my post came accross. For years and years we have all shared stories of abnormal behaviors from our difficult child's. Obviously she is a difficult child. on the other hand, that does not make a murderer. All Warrior Moms know that's true. If she is proven to be..then she is. Two weeks of testimony should give the jurors sufficient information to make that judgement. That's all. DDD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DDD, post: 432349, member: 35"] Sorry if my post sounded like I am convinced Casey is innocent. That was not the intention. My intention was to point out that the trail by media with help from law enforcement began in 2008. I conceed that she is an immature, habitual liar with difficult child tendencies. It in Court she is proven to be the one responsible for the death of her daughter I'm not going to argue the decision. So far, however, I have not heard or read any statements from eye witnesses that she was a poor Mom. Even relatives say that she and her daughter consistently appeared to have a loving caring relationship. There has been no evidence that she is a boozer, has ever been a drug user nor is there evidence that she has been promiscous by today's standards. The Prosecution puts out the theory that she wanted her daughter dead so she could hook up with a guy with-o the responsibility of a child. So far I have heard that each of her boyfriends knew Casey and her daughter as a loving combo. I haven't heard yet that (Like Susan ?? Smith who drowned her little boys) she was in love with a guy who didn't want a kid. So..to me, that sounds like a sexist motivation for murder that was agreed upon by the Prosecution because they couldn't find a specific motive. They have to have a motivation for their case. So the point of my post was not to say she is innocent, or that the grandparents are guilty. The point was that I don't think the public should rush to judgement because of the press coverage. I am also not saying that she was a sexual abuse victim. Who knows? But that wouldn't justify murder anyway. Marg's example is a good one. That Mom was guilty as sin in the press. The Judicial process determined she wasn't. I can't remember which CD family member said that she hated to see rancor among the family. I apologize if that is how my post came accross. For years and years we have all shared stories of abnormal behaviors from our difficult child's. Obviously she is a difficult child. on the other hand, that does not make a murderer. All Warrior Moms know that's true. If she is proven to be..then she is. Two weeks of testimony should give the jurors sufficient information to make that judgement. That's all. DDD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Casey Anthony Bombshell!
Top