It went as expected, her case was dismissed and sealed and expungement hearing will be set wthin 30 days.
I was glad that there were several cases before difficult child's that she got the benefit of watching. It soon became apparent that this judge was no pushover and he questioned each defendant in detail. One guy was there for getting into a fight with anouther man and causing medical costs and protperty damage int he amount of about $400. This man has no job because he was "let go" and he has 8 children and his wife makes very little and they live on food stamps. He tried to argue with the judge on how much a new screen door cost, they were asking for $96. The judge told him he didn't know anywhere you could get a screen door cheaper so he should consider himself lucky. Then the guy tried to tell he had no money and couldn't pay the damages and the judge didn't buy that, told him to get a job. He put him on a three month payment plan and then told him he had another problem because he missed his earlier court date. Yelled at him for that and told him if he misses again he will go to jail.
The next guy was there with his lawyer and AA sponsor. He had a previous DUI and got another one while on probation. Judges don't like that. His attorney explained that after the second DUI he entered a treatment program, then an IOP and aftercare program and has been an active member of AA and has been sober for 6 months now, has a sponsor and has followed all court restrictions. The judge was very troubled and said he was the kind of person he lost sleep over wondering whether he did the right thing. He asked why he should not put him in jail and the man said because of the impact it would have on his job and family and the judge told him he would rather have had him say that he was willing to take whatever punishment the judge felt fair. His sponsor then talked and advocated for the guy and the judge finally agreed to two years probation. loss of license, yellow plates, breathalizer in the steering wheel, etc. I leaned over to difficult child and told her if she ever thought about drinking and driving she should remember this case.
Her case was then called and the judge asked why she stole and she told him it was stupid and she was wrong and would never do it again and he asked if she was homeless and had no clothes and she said no. Then he gave her a lecture on stealing and how it costs everyone more money and how wrong it is when people work hard for their things and someone steals them and how would she feel if he let someone go to her house and take something of her and she would never get a job with a theft conviction and she would never get her vet tech license if that's what she wanted. She was polite and respectful, if a bit shallow in her responses. She does not think very deep at all, knows it's wrong to steal because that's what people tell her but beyond that there isn't much thinking. I do think she has learned a lesson and she remarked that he was tough and her attorney explained that if she ever thought about breaking the law again she should understand things would be a lot tougher.
The judge told her to thank her attorney for getting her into the diversion program and he better never see her again. I was very impressed with the judge and was glad that difficult child saw first hand the wheels of justice and what could happen. Only time will tell if it had the effect on her that we hope it did and that she never wants to be in a courtroom again.