Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
For those watching the Casey A. trial.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HaoZi" data-source="post: 438333"><p>If the defense was doing a better job it'd be worth the pro bono time for them, it's a lot of advertising and name recognition even if (*coughwhencough*) they lose. Unlike most public defenders they're not trying to split their time between too many cases to the point where they barely have time to learn the case at all. Considering the time they've dedicated to this, they should have been far better prepared. To me this says they know or have reason to believe she's guilty of something in this case so they're tossing red herrings everywhere. Or they're really really incompetent. </p><p></p><p>I do wonder about the timing of hiring bug boy. Also was he first on their list, or did other experts turn down the job? If he was first, why?</p><p></p><p>Marcie, it's not required by Florida to have capital case experience, but it's in the client's best interest for sure.</p><p></p><p>ETA: I believe they can during rebuttal. Defense would be stupid to call her for questioning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HaoZi, post: 438333"] If the defense was doing a better job it'd be worth the pro bono time for them, it's a lot of advertising and name recognition even if (*coughwhencough*) they lose. Unlike most public defenders they're not trying to split their time between too many cases to the point where they barely have time to learn the case at all. Considering the time they've dedicated to this, they should have been far better prepared. To me this says they know or have reason to believe she's guilty of something in this case so they're tossing red herrings everywhere. Or they're really really incompetent. I do wonder about the timing of hiring bug boy. Also was he first on their list, or did other experts turn down the job? If he was first, why? Marcie, it's not required by Florida to have capital case experience, but it's in the client's best interest for sure. ETA: I believe they can during rebuttal. Defense would be stupid to call her for questioning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
For those watching the Casey A. trial.....
Top