Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Hannah Anderson kidnap case?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SuZir" data-source="post: 604596" data-attributes="member: 14557"><p>Yes, gfgness certainly makes you a prime candidate to be exploited by creeps. Same as developmental and physical disabilities or poor home life. Creeps know very well to target to the easy victims and pass the kids who are more likely able to defend themselves.</p><p></p><p>In my understanding it isn't too often, that creeps would victimise kids they have more difficult time to have access, when there are kids that are more accessible. Or less likely to report them. For example disabled children are three to four times more likely to end up being abused (three times as likely for sexual abuse and four times for physical abuse) than kids without disabilities.</p><p></p><p>And while almost all teens have their dirty little secrets, kids with issues have them more and are much more vulnerable to be used than kids with less secrets. And that added to their overall vulnerability making them to be more in the risk, it is indeed likely, that most kids who ended up being hurt by creeps had issues even before that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SuZir, post: 604596, member: 14557"] Yes, gfgness certainly makes you a prime candidate to be exploited by creeps. Same as developmental and physical disabilities or poor home life. Creeps know very well to target to the easy victims and pass the kids who are more likely able to defend themselves. In my understanding it isn't too often, that creeps would victimise kids they have more difficult time to have access, when there are kids that are more accessible. Or less likely to report them. For example disabled children are three to four times more likely to end up being abused (three times as likely for sexual abuse and four times for physical abuse) than kids without disabilities. And while almost all teens have their dirty little secrets, kids with issues have them more and are much more vulnerable to be used than kids with less secrets. And that added to their overall vulnerability making them to be more in the risk, it is indeed likely, that most kids who ended up being hurt by creeps had issues even before that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Hannah Anderson kidnap case?
Top