I am new to the cyber world and I lucked on to this site poking around. Clearly I have been upset and I do know that I have reason to be upset. And I am not insensitive, despite the cutting edge of my words. I am angry. I have listened to and believed people who were not on mark and who do not truly understand over the years with respect to my sons issues. And it is he who misses out and he who compensates and he does deserve the care and attention and the appropriate guidance and services that can help him. So I am discouraged, frustrated, and maybe I do not understand fully what this site is intending to provide. Perhaps my lack of familiarity with the cyber experiance and connecting in written word with the great wide internet is what I am getting these messages. Asserting or attacking? I do feel that it is in the communication that the essence of what is perceived is shared. When I use language that describes or is intended to:describe from my view the shadow side of how this journey in life has been for me like when I referred to "rage queens" or when I referred to "jqesq. Saint mcmoney" what I hoped my reader would consider is that openly critizising a person for feeling hurt by being reacted to when hye, it is awfull having this like this for my child or for me as a parent. As inflamitory as it is as a thought the legal proffession does make more off of criminal cases than off Disability Act for children. When pay for service is the point of contention for access to services that do require a viguerous and committed legal representative. Recall the attorney is looking at what is worth his time. so that does share an opinion that some are worthless. And it is the worthlessness that a child with a conduct disorder and or a learning disability are confronted at all times. This is not the first child or the only child who has not recieved the services or the correct attention they do require to have success in learning. I have been receiving posts that share the opinion that at an age level or due to the schools prioritising it is condoned to neglect. I hope and I am a voice for ending the discontent (malaise) and for taking the oppertunity to use what we do have as knowledge to aid students not when they are failing only, not after they fall apart, not when it troubles a teacher because the class is disrupted by a child with a disorder.Or not to neglect because the child posses not one bit of trouble to another. but because they are unique and their process to learn and the skill to do so is possible. We pay anyway, don't we? We pay when our children are untreated and fail and do not learn and become court issues. We pay at lost productivity when a child is and adult who has compensated all their life on negative attention and can not contribute. We pay with Kazinskis' who are used in experiments at Harvard but are not giving care to unique guenious and the potential for madness that can be cultivated by shunning a great mind and mocking a fragile psyci. I am aware that I have offended and I do not intend to seem to attack. I mean what I ask when I question those who are writing that they do not understand me,or suggest that english must not be my language. Or that you can not imagine what country I am from. The disability act for children in schools needs to be implemented and not have the biases of folklore prevent these children and younge adults from receiving the services so do well as students. It is not so much work, it is what is needed. Also, I may decide to query others about the way I can better provide you with what you may need to help more. I am leery of disclosure. and I am leery of the critisms that have been directed at me for my view. Not that I am not understood,so much as when I am told my words are so unwelcome that I am locked out. I really wonder about that. How is it that what I offer is so detestable? I am mostly talking and writing about the lack of concern for chidren withlearning needs. Kids like mine. worthy kids.