Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
More invasion of our privacy--photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hound dog" data-source="post: 308722" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>I think honestly..............a person can pretty much easily tell an innocent snapshot from kiddie porn. I have nude pics of my kids as infants in the bath. Not kiddie porn. Sorry. Although due to the stupidness of others........all my kids were told to take tub photos and the like with their digitals in order to avoid trouble.</p><p> </p><p>I mean, I somehow doubt most child porn rings bring their film to wallie world to be developed. sheesh Most especially when digital photos are all the rage and is much simpler, faster, and convienent.</p><p> </p><p>I stopped having photos develped many years ago because of this, back when this first started. I won't have a dept store tell me what I can and can't photograph. I don't condone kiddie porn.....personally think those involved need some good ol' fashion torture with a public hanging for desert....but who gives dept stores the right to decide what's porn and what's an innocent baby picture??</p><p> </p><p>Sorry. Sore spot with me. I've got a picture of Travis as a baby folks........taking by walmart photographers.......with him in a tub. Ok kid had his diaper on, but one wouldn't know it by looking at the picture. So??? Hmmmmm??</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hound dog, post: 308722, member: 84"] I think honestly..............a person can pretty much easily tell an innocent snapshot from kiddie porn. I have nude pics of my kids as infants in the bath. Not kiddie porn. Sorry. Although due to the stupidness of others........all my kids were told to take tub photos and the like with their digitals in order to avoid trouble. I mean, I somehow doubt most child porn rings bring their film to wallie world to be developed. sheesh Most especially when digital photos are all the rage and is much simpler, faster, and convienent. I stopped having photos develped many years ago because of this, back when this first started. I won't have a dept store tell me what I can and can't photograph. I don't condone kiddie porn.....personally think those involved need some good ol' fashion torture with a public hanging for desert....but who gives dept stores the right to decide what's porn and what's an innocent baby picture?? Sorry. Sore spot with me. I've got a picture of Travis as a baby folks........taking by walmart photographers.......with him in a tub. Ok kid had his diaper on, but one wouldn't know it by looking at the picture. So??? Hmmmmm?? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
More invasion of our privacy--photos
Top