Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Opinions needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shari" data-source="post: 224052" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p><span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px">This is on the employer. The "second physician" should have been ruling on whether or not he had a condition that would qualify for intermittent FMLA or not - <strong>nothing more</strong>. What were his findings, just out of curiosity?</span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Wynter's right, too, about the contracted physician part. This info is null and void. Proving it may be hard, tho.</span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px">And if he has FMLA protection and is realeased to resume work, if he can't perform his previous duties, the company needs to find work for him at similar pay grade. </span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Get a complaint in to the labor dept. It takes a while, but get it rolling. There's a lot of gray in FMLA but this doesn't sound gray at all.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Helv'"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shari, post: 224052, member: 1848"] [FONT=Helv][SIZE=2]This is on the employer. The "second physician" should have been ruling on whether or not he had a condition that would qualify for intermittent FMLA or not - [B]nothing more[/B]. What were his findings, just out of curiosity? Wynter's right, too, about the contracted physician part. This info is null and void. Proving it may be hard, tho. And if he has FMLA protection and is realeased to resume work, if he can't perform his previous duties, the company needs to find work for him at similar pay grade. Get a complaint in to the labor dept. It takes a while, but get it rolling. There's a lot of gray in FMLA but this doesn't sound gray at all. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Opinions needed
Top