Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
psychiatric Residential Treatment Center (RTC) question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 246483" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>Well, it appeared to me a psychiatric Residential Treatment Center (RTC) would want neuropysch testing done but I guess we'll wait and see how that plays out.</p><p></p><p>In prgress now is "almost" having difficult child approved for medicaid- hopefully this will be done by tomorrow. Then, will they pay for Residential Treatment Center (RTC). I have a lady from state doe looking into which sd is responsible for covering educational costs, or if no sd is (which would seem illegal to me), then who is responsible for it. Also, she's looking into the fact that the ed spec at his home sd wants to only use teacher/parent forms to do psychiatric assessment for his triennial review, yet teachers have only seen difficult child about 4 school days the last 2 mos and haven't seen him at all in 3 weeks. I want them to administer tests for this (in areas where he showed weaknessees beofre) instead of using forms.</p><p></p><p>Attorneys- boy, what a mess. I was going to hire the private one and met with him on Monday. Then, after an hour, he said this might be a conflict of interest because difficult child's offense was agaiinst me and he would have to cross examine me, yet I'm paying his fee. I wondered why he didn't raise that question a week earlier if it was an issue, but didn't think it should be an issue because how many juveniles would get no legal representation if it wasn't permitted for the parent to hire an attny for them. Anyway, he said he would let me know for sure Tues. morning and we'd sign agreement then.</p><p></p><p>I didn't hear back from him on Tues., but I did get a call from court appointment attny on Tuesday and he did seem to be ready to really defend difficult child, so I figured I'd just let the court appointment attny handle it then. But, late yesterday afternoon, the private attny leaves a message saying he's fine with taking the case now and is starting work on it. I figured I'd call him this morning and tell him "never mind"- he waited too long to tell me and court appointment attny is on it.</p><p></p><p>So, this morning I start out making more critical phone calls- one being to CA. While talking with her, she mentioned that private attny had already been down there this morning to discuss difficult child's case with her and that he was getting ready to submit form to replace the court appointment attny. Now, I haven't called him yet but am getting ready to. I am not happy with him right now. I gave him a very small check on Monday, but have not signed any agreement, and have not given him a credit card number to bill his time to. I'll call him in a few mins.</p><p></p><p>The CA, though, seems to be ok with difficult child going to an Residential Treatment Center (RTC)- I'll have to bring info to court and testify to this as well. The issues of payment, court order, transportation there are still not resolved. Plus, I need to get a written report in hand from psychiatrist where difficult child is now. The CA isn't quite as sold on lowering the charge to a misdemeanor from a felony, but agreed to talk to cops and see what they say. They will probably want to keep it a felony charge, but hopefully, someone will review the actual statement that I wrote that night and they should consider that difficult child did not try to wound me, as the charge states, (if he'd tried, he would have been able to accomplish it), but was threatening and intimidating by his actions. That is assualt (a misdemeanor). I told CA that this is important because it effects what types of treatment and facilities that I can get difficult child into, which is true.</p><p></p><p>Oh- CA was asking about PO, like she was going to consult with her. I didn't foresee this, but it gave me opportunity to relay all the idiotic things PO had said and done and not done that I had considered out of line and contributing to the problem. The CA listened and agreed with me a few times. I told her that I cringed at the thought of that PO being in our lives for one more day and I didn't care if it was a month from now or two years from now- I hoped she nor her supervisor were ever in our lives again. RThis was after I told her about how she'd undermined my authority, refused to get services for us, then turned around and blamed the problems on me, and now just wants difficult child locked up. I gave specific examples so CA would know this was valid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 246483, member: 3699"] Well, it appeared to me a psychiatric Residential Treatment Center (RTC) would want neuropysch testing done but I guess we'll wait and see how that plays out. In prgress now is "almost" having difficult child approved for medicaid- hopefully this will be done by tomorrow. Then, will they pay for Residential Treatment Center (RTC). I have a lady from state doe looking into which sd is responsible for covering educational costs, or if no sd is (which would seem illegal to me), then who is responsible for it. Also, she's looking into the fact that the ed spec at his home sd wants to only use teacher/parent forms to do psychiatric assessment for his triennial review, yet teachers have only seen difficult child about 4 school days the last 2 mos and haven't seen him at all in 3 weeks. I want them to administer tests for this (in areas where he showed weaknessees beofre) instead of using forms. Attorneys- boy, what a mess. I was going to hire the private one and met with him on Monday. Then, after an hour, he said this might be a conflict of interest because difficult child's offense was agaiinst me and he would have to cross examine me, yet I'm paying his fee. I wondered why he didn't raise that question a week earlier if it was an issue, but didn't think it should be an issue because how many juveniles would get no legal representation if it wasn't permitted for the parent to hire an attny for them. Anyway, he said he would let me know for sure Tues. morning and we'd sign agreement then. I didn't hear back from him on Tues., but I did get a call from court appointment attny on Tuesday and he did seem to be ready to really defend difficult child, so I figured I'd just let the court appointment attny handle it then. But, late yesterday afternoon, the private attny leaves a message saying he's fine with taking the case now and is starting work on it. I figured I'd call him this morning and tell him "never mind"- he waited too long to tell me and court appointment attny is on it. So, this morning I start out making more critical phone calls- one being to CA. While talking with her, she mentioned that private attny had already been down there this morning to discuss difficult child's case with her and that he was getting ready to submit form to replace the court appointment attny. Now, I haven't called him yet but am getting ready to. I am not happy with him right now. I gave him a very small check on Monday, but have not signed any agreement, and have not given him a credit card number to bill his time to. I'll call him in a few mins. The CA, though, seems to be ok with difficult child going to an Residential Treatment Center (RTC)- I'll have to bring info to court and testify to this as well. The issues of payment, court order, transportation there are still not resolved. Plus, I need to get a written report in hand from psychiatrist where difficult child is now. The CA isn't quite as sold on lowering the charge to a misdemeanor from a felony, but agreed to talk to cops and see what they say. They will probably want to keep it a felony charge, but hopefully, someone will review the actual statement that I wrote that night and they should consider that difficult child did not try to wound me, as the charge states, (if he'd tried, he would have been able to accomplish it), but was threatening and intimidating by his actions. That is assualt (a misdemeanor). I told CA that this is important because it effects what types of treatment and facilities that I can get difficult child into, which is true. Oh- CA was asking about PO, like she was going to consult with her. I didn't foresee this, but it gave me opportunity to relay all the idiotic things PO had said and done and not done that I had considered out of line and contributing to the problem. The CA listened and agreed with me a few times. I told her that I cringed at the thought of that PO being in our lives for one more day and I didn't care if it was a month from now or two years from now- I hoped she nor her supervisor were ever in our lives again. RThis was after I told her about how she'd undermined my authority, refused to get services for us, then turned around and blamed the problems on me, and now just wants difficult child locked up. I gave specific examples so CA would know this was valid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
psychiatric Residential Treatment Center (RTC) question
Top