Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
The Birds & The Bee's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marguerite" data-source="post: 399204" data-attributes="member: 1991"><p>On the subject of explaining about sex, when my kids could handle it (especially the girls) I explained about the emotional fallout of sex. There is supposed to be an emotional connection before you indulge in that level of physical intimacy. If you are too free with sex, it sends very confused messages to either your own brain, or the other person's. It's not fair to do this; better to say no, and back off, than mess with someone's head. Or your own head.</p><p></p><p>Our main concern here was easy child 2/difficult child 2 - "round heels", as people would say. Not promiscuous but serially monogamous, but the same constant need for cuddles (often at awkward or inappropriate times) that we saw in her all through childhood, meant that the first guy who went all the way with her would not be able to believe his luck. And it happened as we feared - her first real boyfriend went around in a daze with a delighted glazed expression on his face. He was hooked, badly. So when they broke up, it went badly. Very messy. He's a cartoonist (gifted amateur) whose drawings are on the internet, in to me, fairly obvious depictions of easy child 2/difficult child 2 in graphic sexual bondage poses. She is now married to someone else, but the images are still out there, I believe. The claim is, it's a generic cartoon character; but the clothing the character is wearing is easy child 2/difficult child 2's unique fashion based on her old school uniform (which is an unusual combination, one might say - unique). He's even got the same plaid design on the skirt... that's not coincidence!</p><p></p><p>This got more complicated because this exBF was also a groomsman at difficult child 1's wedding. He's still in contact with difficult child 1 and his best friend. </p><p></p><p>Things that make you go "hmmm..."</p><p></p><p>Marg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marguerite, post: 399204, member: 1991"] On the subject of explaining about sex, when my kids could handle it (especially the girls) I explained about the emotional fallout of sex. There is supposed to be an emotional connection before you indulge in that level of physical intimacy. If you are too free with sex, it sends very confused messages to either your own brain, or the other person's. It's not fair to do this; better to say no, and back off, than mess with someone's head. Or your own head. Our main concern here was easy child 2/difficult child 2 - "round heels", as people would say. Not promiscuous but serially monogamous, but the same constant need for cuddles (often at awkward or inappropriate times) that we saw in her all through childhood, meant that the first guy who went all the way with her would not be able to believe his luck. And it happened as we feared - her first real boyfriend went around in a daze with a delighted glazed expression on his face. He was hooked, badly. So when they broke up, it went badly. Very messy. He's a cartoonist (gifted amateur) whose drawings are on the internet, in to me, fairly obvious depictions of easy child 2/difficult child 2 in graphic sexual bondage poses. She is now married to someone else, but the images are still out there, I believe. The claim is, it's a generic cartoon character; but the clothing the character is wearing is easy child 2/difficult child 2's unique fashion based on her old school uniform (which is an unusual combination, one might say - unique). He's even got the same plaid design on the skirt... that's not coincidence! This got more complicated because this exBF was also a groomsman at difficult child 1's wedding. He's still in contact with difficult child 1 and his best friend. Things that make you go "hmmm..." Marg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
The Birds & The Bee's
Top