Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
VC & meeting are over
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 492963" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>I dropped a copy of the brochure off at attny's office and made some notes on the back- basicly, PO was supposed to have the parole plan (not just placement decision) written and presented yesterday- that would legally have to include terms of parole and any required services, time limits, etc, to step doown and ultimately get off parole. They wouldn't even answer these questions directly when asked. Secondly, they verbally claim reunification is the goal however the program isn't a reunification prgram. Thirdly, they told difficult child he could be out as early as 3 mos but when directly asked what it would take other than difficult child maintaining good behavior for 3 mos, there answer was "we'll just have to see how he's doing and determine then when we think he's ready". That is NOT a measurable goal, which is required for any gov service, program, and even parole/probation.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, I'm asking for a hearing before a judge for any reason the attny can get it there to 1) ask if there can be an established reunification plan, the same as dss is required to do, 2) if there is not going to be a reunification plan, then can I be released from csu requirements, 3) clarify what are rights, responsibilities, and requirements</p><p></p><p>But most importantly, it would force PO/super to submit to the court their current parole plan- not just the placement issue- so they would have to have measurable goals written and submitted, as they are required by law to do, otherwise a judge would have no idea how to evaluate the case. "We'll see how it goes and how he's doing and what we think, even if he's behaved for 90 days" won't cut it in court.</p><p></p><p>It's my understanding that a kid coming out of a Department of Juvenile Justice facility can have the case reviewed by a judge. That alone is grounds for a hearing if requested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 492963, member: 3699"] I dropped a copy of the brochure off at attny's office and made some notes on the back- basicly, PO was supposed to have the parole plan (not just placement decision) written and presented yesterday- that would legally have to include terms of parole and any required services, time limits, etc, to step doown and ultimately get off parole. They wouldn't even answer these questions directly when asked. Secondly, they verbally claim reunification is the goal however the program isn't a reunification prgram. Thirdly, they told difficult child he could be out as early as 3 mos but when directly asked what it would take other than difficult child maintaining good behavior for 3 mos, there answer was "we'll just have to see how he's doing and determine then when we think he's ready". That is NOT a measurable goal, which is required for any gov service, program, and even parole/probation. Therefore, I'm asking for a hearing before a judge for any reason the attny can get it there to 1) ask if there can be an established reunification plan, the same as dss is required to do, 2) if there is not going to be a reunification plan, then can I be released from csu requirements, 3) clarify what are rights, responsibilities, and requirements But most importantly, it would force PO/super to submit to the court their current parole plan- not just the placement issue- so they would have to have measurable goals written and submitted, as they are required by law to do, otherwise a judge would have no idea how to evaluate the case. "We'll see how it goes and how he's doing and what we think, even if he's behaved for 90 days" won't cut it in court. It's my understanding that a kid coming out of a Department of Juvenile Justice facility can have the case reviewed by a judge. That alone is grounds for a hearing if requested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
VC & meeting are over
Top