Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
What's the best approach for this...and is this really a viable argument?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slsh" data-source="post: 468049" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>It is absolutely a change of placement if they pull that aide (placement is *services*, not geographical place) - and, once again, I'm wondering what in the heck these people are thinking? Increase length of time in building, throw him into mainstream math class (after 3 *years* of their *$&%* shortened school day bologna), and pull the aide all at the same time??? Thank goodness sped teacher is backing you up on this - because it's sabotage, clear and simple, in my humble opinion.</p><p></p><p>They don't have an aide for that time frame? Too bad - IEP says he needs one - hire one. Period. End of discussion. *Or* you'd be more than happy to give them the opportunity to explain to a hearing officer/civil judge on why they have shown a continued pattern of failing to provide FAPE in LRE. For 3 unbelievable years! </p><p></p><p>You know how this will play out. Wee will justifiably and understandably be unable to manage in mainstream math, SD is going to say "Oh, he can't handle extended times in bldg", and once again, he's going to be getting less than half the education he's entitled to.</p><p></p><p>It may be time to seriously consider getting DOE/courts involved in this, because I really think SD is going to keep on with- this junk until someone with- the power to force them to comply with- IDEA gets very forcefully involved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slsh, post: 468049, member: 8"] It is absolutely a change of placement if they pull that aide (placement is *services*, not geographical place) - and, once again, I'm wondering what in the heck these people are thinking? Increase length of time in building, throw him into mainstream math class (after 3 *years* of their *$&%* shortened school day bologna), and pull the aide all at the same time??? Thank goodness sped teacher is backing you up on this - because it's sabotage, clear and simple, in my humble opinion. They don't have an aide for that time frame? Too bad - IEP says he needs one - hire one. Period. End of discussion. *Or* you'd be more than happy to give them the opportunity to explain to a hearing officer/civil judge on why they have shown a continued pattern of failing to provide FAPE in LRE. For 3 unbelievable years! You know how this will play out. Wee will justifiably and understandably be unable to manage in mainstream math, SD is going to say "Oh, he can't handle extended times in bldg", and once again, he's going to be getting less than half the education he's entitled to. It may be time to seriously consider getting DOE/courts involved in this, because I really think SD is going to keep on with- this junk until someone with- the power to force them to comply with- IDEA gets very forcefully involved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
What's the best approach for this...and is this really a viable argument?
Top