Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
Adverse educational impact
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Martie" data-source="post: 8414" data-attributes="member: 284"><p>Sue,</p><p></p><p>It can go either way--if they are trying to make a case to remove a child to a more secure setting, then looking at some one crooked will be documented as a "threat." If the opposite case is being made, (no negative educational impact), then difficult child's wonderfulness will be documented.</p><p></p><p>What I was trying to convey above was that I experienced both teacher behaviors within a 2 month period with the same child. Before winter break in 1999, ex-difficult child was a really big passive-aggressive problem for them (true, but he was very different--not the typical acter-out but he was a time eater for the teachers none-the-less. One of his 'specialties' was subtly distracting ADHD boys in his class, who were then blamed for their own distractions. These boys were often bullying ex-difficult child, so this was his revenge.)</p><p></p><p>AFTER his refusal to return to school, and the case study evaluation was initiated (ex-difficult child DID go back after a week somewhat sporadically), then a more wonderful, bright and talented child could not be found anywhere--thus no negative educational impact. However, we had a very good psychiatrist who was supportive that difficult child was headed for big trouble (depression & suicidality) and needed accommodation of his emotional needs.</p><p></p><p>So long answer to a short concept: teachers can try to have it both ways with the same kid!!!</p><p></p><p>Martie</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Martie, post: 8414, member: 284"] Sue, It can go either way--if they are trying to make a case to remove a child to a more secure setting, then looking at some one crooked will be documented as a "threat." If the opposite case is being made, (no negative educational impact), then difficult child's wonderfulness will be documented. What I was trying to convey above was that I experienced both teacher behaviors within a 2 month period with the same child. Before winter break in 1999, ex-difficult child was a really big passive-aggressive problem for them (true, but he was very different--not the typical acter-out but he was a time eater for the teachers none-the-less. One of his 'specialties' was subtly distracting ADHD boys in his class, who were then blamed for their own distractions. These boys were often bullying ex-difficult child, so this was his revenge.) AFTER his refusal to return to school, and the case study evaluation was initiated (ex-difficult child DID go back after a week somewhat sporadically), then a more wonderful, bright and talented child could not be found anywhere--thus no negative educational impact. However, we had a very good psychiatrist who was supportive that difficult child was headed for big trouble (depression & suicidality) and needed accommodation of his emotional needs. So long answer to a short concept: teachers can try to have it both ways with the same kid!!! Martie [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
Adverse educational impact
Top