LittleDudesMom
Well-Known Member
I may be slammed for my opinion, but I beleive Imas is the scapegoat for those who cannot be touched or named. Those who have too much influence or power to be fired or punished.
Having said that, I believe his words were injurours, but not filled with hate, to the Rutgers players. And, this should be made clear, it was not a slur on woman, it was a direct slur on black woman. He is an old white guy who was trying to be cool and funny. He is neither. His words were abhorant. He has a history of negative racial speach but has never been called to the table before. A couple years ago, when Rahama Ellis was assigned to cover the White House, Imas made a comment about the cleaning woman now covering the house. No Al Shartpton or Jessie Jackson coming out to defend this woman of color who had achieved a huge goal in her life.
Does that make his comments acceptable? No. Were they still hurtful? Yes. Would he still be wrong? Yes.
Do those who make their living in the public eye have a responsibility to set an example?
Are Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson the moral police in this country?
While I believe words can hurt, I also believe our right to free speech should be protected. But, with all freedoms come responsibility. The right to vote carries responsiblity. The right to bear arms comes with responsibility. So does our right to use words to express our opinions.
When our words hurt someone or a group of someones, does that mean we loose our right? Does our right of free speech include the right to sling hurt and prejudice?
Who makes the rules of what crosses the line? Who decides which words are hurtful and which are not?
All these questions are ones that have swirled in mind the last week or so.
Understanding a group of people's struggles does allow you to empathize. Knowing the my children's father could not go into McDonalds and sit down and eat a cheeseburger when he was a little boy goes a long way to understanding how long and hard the fight for civil rights has been (and still is).
My children are taught not to judge others on religion, life station, skin color, size, hair color, or the quality of their shoes. I (and we) have worked hard to see that the children are desensatized to the differences among us and experience the similarities and the awe of understanding how much we have in common with others as much as possible.
It is the responsibility of all parents/guardians/grandparents to teach the next generation to respect all people - not just men, not just whites (or whatever your ethnic group), not just those who are the same as us. Until we reach the point where people are willing to step out of their comfort zones and try to find understanding, acceptance, and tolerance for others, we will always have those who judge by word and deed. We will always have a generation of young men who thing it's ok to degrade woman. We will always have a generation of children who think it's ok to to judge those less fortunate. We will always have a generation who prefers to stay with those who are just like them than experience the wonder and life change that comes with tolerance of others.
It is up to us all to make sure that comments like these disappear. It's a tough fight, but this generation that we are raising can be better, but it's up to us to show them.
This is a problem that all society must address; not just cbs and msnbc.
Sharon
Having said that, I believe his words were injurours, but not filled with hate, to the Rutgers players. And, this should be made clear, it was not a slur on woman, it was a direct slur on black woman. He is an old white guy who was trying to be cool and funny. He is neither. His words were abhorant. He has a history of negative racial speach but has never been called to the table before. A couple years ago, when Rahama Ellis was assigned to cover the White House, Imas made a comment about the cleaning woman now covering the house. No Al Shartpton or Jessie Jackson coming out to defend this woman of color who had achieved a huge goal in her life.
Does that make his comments acceptable? No. Were they still hurtful? Yes. Would he still be wrong? Yes.
Do those who make their living in the public eye have a responsibility to set an example?
Are Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson the moral police in this country?
While I believe words can hurt, I also believe our right to free speech should be protected. But, with all freedoms come responsibility. The right to vote carries responsiblity. The right to bear arms comes with responsibility. So does our right to use words to express our opinions.
When our words hurt someone or a group of someones, does that mean we loose our right? Does our right of free speech include the right to sling hurt and prejudice?
Who makes the rules of what crosses the line? Who decides which words are hurtful and which are not?
All these questions are ones that have swirled in mind the last week or so.
Understanding a group of people's struggles does allow you to empathize. Knowing the my children's father could not go into McDonalds and sit down and eat a cheeseburger when he was a little boy goes a long way to understanding how long and hard the fight for civil rights has been (and still is).
My children are taught not to judge others on religion, life station, skin color, size, hair color, or the quality of their shoes. I (and we) have worked hard to see that the children are desensatized to the differences among us and experience the similarities and the awe of understanding how much we have in common with others as much as possible.
It is the responsibility of all parents/guardians/grandparents to teach the next generation to respect all people - not just men, not just whites (or whatever your ethnic group), not just those who are the same as us. Until we reach the point where people are willing to step out of their comfort zones and try to find understanding, acceptance, and tolerance for others, we will always have those who judge by word and deed. We will always have a generation of young men who thing it's ok to degrade woman. We will always have a generation of children who think it's ok to to judge those less fortunate. We will always have a generation who prefers to stay with those who are just like them than experience the wonder and life change that comes with tolerance of others.
It is up to us all to make sure that comments like these disappear. It's a tough fight, but this generation that we are raising can be better, but it's up to us to show them.
This is a problem that all society must address; not just cbs and msnbc.
Sharon