Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Kanga got fired
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slsh" data-source="post: 369835" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>JJJ - I think question #1 is the biggie. Sometimes I think staff gets lax and forgets the absolute importance, and reason for, eyes-on supervision, or they just think the kid has changed because they haven't seen anything inappropriate recently. been there done that. It was nauseating. I didn't know 13 was a landmark age, but I do remember that with- thank you's "infraction", DCFS had to investigate because the other child was a ward and their brilliant conclusion was that since both were under 12 and it was "consensual" (in what parallel universe???), that was the end of it. </p><p></p><p>I would think Residential Treatment Center (RTC) would know better. This is not new behavior to them specifically, or to any Residential Treatment Center (RTC) for that matter. It just seems, in my experience at least, to be a not uncommon occurrence, unfortunately. I would have expected this Residential Treatment Center (RTC) to be much more proactive though. </p><p></p><p>Sigh. I'm sorry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slsh, post: 369835, member: 8"] JJJ - I think question #1 is the biggie. Sometimes I think staff gets lax and forgets the absolute importance, and reason for, eyes-on supervision, or they just think the kid has changed because they haven't seen anything inappropriate recently. been there done that. It was nauseating. I didn't know 13 was a landmark age, but I do remember that with- thank you's "infraction", DCFS had to investigate because the other child was a ward and their brilliant conclusion was that since both were under 12 and it was "consensual" (in what parallel universe???), that was the end of it. I would think Residential Treatment Center (RTC) would know better. This is not new behavior to them specifically, or to any Residential Treatment Center (RTC) for that matter. It just seems, in my experience at least, to be a not uncommon occurrence, unfortunately. I would have expected this Residential Treatment Center (RTC) to be much more proactive though. Sigh. I'm sorry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Kanga got fired
Top