Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Something at work...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Copabanana" data-source="post: 708808" data-attributes="member: 18958"><p>I can understand how you feel but I agree with both PASA and mof.</p><p></p><p>You spoke from a sense of responsibility, and I think probably to protect the innocent of the two women. The 2nd woman really burdened you with the responsibility to speak, preferring to avoid discomfort. Instead, it seems you took the hit. You did this because this is who you are. Responsible and clear.</p><p></p><p>Of course it can be uncomfortable to be direct and true. But is it wrong? I do not think so. Thus to mof's point: you may have indeed protected colleague number 1, from even greater harm. And you certainly spoke up for colleague number 2, as well as the group at large.</p><p></p><p>That said, it is uncomfortable. But It is not wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Copabanana, post: 708808, member: 18958"] I can understand how you feel but I agree with both PASA and mof. You spoke from a sense of responsibility, and I think probably to protect the innocent of the two women. The 2nd woman really burdened you with the responsibility to speak, preferring to avoid discomfort. Instead, it seems you took the hit. You did this because this is who you are. Responsible and clear. Of course it can be uncomfortable to be direct and true. But is it wrong? I do not think so. Thus to mof's point: you may have indeed protected colleague number 1, from even greater harm. And you certainly spoke up for colleague number 2, as well as the group at large. That said, it is uncomfortable. But It is not wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Something at work...
Top