Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Parent Emeritus
Today, results of psychological evaluation for DGD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsaneCdn" data-source="post: 675125" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>There are always lots of questions, but this one in particular stands out to me, because we've been through that one too. These specialists are human. They have their own personal biases, their own pet theories, and their own evaluation of people. One tester downplayed OUR input because it was "inconsistent" with her own observations... and the adult specialists took the opposite approach because we had many more years dealing with this individual.</p><p> </p><p>Usually, we got "something" out of each round of testing, but it was hard to get a complete picture. I really like it that you ended up with a panel, not just "a" specialist - sometimes, this produces results with less bias built in. </p><p> </p><p>(For the record, there are individual specialists in testing and evaluation that are extremely professional, and have learned to put their own biases aside, and do a very good job. Some are at the absolute top in their field and others are average, or below...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsaneCdn, post: 675125, member: 11791"] There are always lots of questions, but this one in particular stands out to me, because we've been through that one too. These specialists are human. They have their own personal biases, their own pet theories, and their own evaluation of people. One tester downplayed OUR input because it was "inconsistent" with her own observations... and the adult specialists took the opposite approach because we had many more years dealing with this individual. Usually, we got "something" out of each round of testing, but it was hard to get a complete picture. I really like it that you ended up with a panel, not just "a" specialist - sometimes, this produces results with less bias built in. (For the record, there are individual specialists in testing and evaluation that are extremely professional, and have learned to put their own biases aside, and do a very good job. Some are at the absolute top in their field and others are average, or below...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Parent Emeritus
Today, results of psychological evaluation for DGD
Top