Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
Transition to 504 Likely?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sheila" data-source="post: 5726" data-attributes="member: 23"><p>"By quoting this, are you saying it's a bad idea in all cases?"</p><p></p><p>Not at all. I agree that there are too many instances of "no negative impact" according to the sds. Every advantage needs to go the student/parent in my opinion. </p><p></p><p>I edited the second url address out so as not to confuse the issue, e.g., every decision in our sd seems to be motivated by money and that url seemed to be feeding into that sd behavior. Sorry about the confusion.</p><p></p><p>My brain is pretty saturated right now so I may be reading the reg incorrectly, but I'm interpreting this as an agreement between parent and sd to sign a waiver for reevaluation doesn't automatically mean parent and sd agree to continued eligibility. Perhaps it does after incorporting additional regs. I haven't researched to see if reevaluation is still required before a student is dismissed from or denied IEP eligibility.</p><p></p><p>I'd want to know my difficult child still qualified for an IEP in the eyes of the sd before signing a waiver, however. I can see where there may be instances wherein a sd's strategy would be to lead a parent into signing a reevaluation waive, then turning right around at the IEP meeting and declaring the student no longer eligible for an IEP.</p><p></p><p>I believe I'd wait to sign a waiver to reevaluate until the new IEP is written. Both the waiver and IEP could be done at the same meeting.</p><p></p><p>This is going to bug me until I've researched dismissal from eligibility further, but I don't have time right now. lol</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sheila, post: 5726, member: 23"] "By quoting this, are you saying it's a bad idea in all cases?" Not at all. I agree that there are too many instances of "no negative impact" according to the sds. Every advantage needs to go the student/parent in my opinion. I edited the second url address out so as not to confuse the issue, e.g., every decision in our sd seems to be motivated by money and that url seemed to be feeding into that sd behavior. Sorry about the confusion. My brain is pretty saturated right now so I may be reading the reg incorrectly, but I'm interpreting this as an agreement between parent and sd to sign a waiver for reevaluation doesn't automatically mean parent and sd agree to continued eligibility. Perhaps it does after incorporting additional regs. I haven't researched to see if reevaluation is still required before a student is dismissed from or denied IEP eligibility. I'd want to know my difficult child still qualified for an IEP in the eyes of the sd before signing a waiver, however. I can see where there may be instances wherein a sd's strategy would be to lead a parent into signing a reevaluation waive, then turning right around at the IEP meeting and declaring the student no longer eligible for an IEP. I believe I'd wait to sign a waiver to reevaluate until the new IEP is written. Both the waiver and IEP could be done at the same meeting. This is going to bug me until I've researched dismissal from eligibility further, but I don't have time right now. lol [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
Transition to 504 Likely?
Top