Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
New PETA ad...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DammitJanet" data-source="post: 299181" data-attributes="member: 1514"><p>Thanks Dazed...after I wrote that it occurred to me you meant it exactly the way you just explained it. </p><p></p><p>Back to Micheal Vick. I dont know for sure whose bright idea it was to stick him back in the spotlight advocating for anti-dogfighting. Whoever it was, they are idiots. </p><p></p><p>Jamie knew about the bust before it went down. Vick wasnt just letting his buddies run the ring from his property or letting them board the dogs there. He knew all about it, he participated materially. He owned a majority of those dogs. He fought those dogs and he participated in the killing of those dogs. He will deny to his death that he fought those dogs for money. </p><p></p><p>So I maintain that if Micheal Vick fought his dogs without fighting them for money <strong>OR </strong>he stood around and just watched any dogs fight, then he is one very sick individual becuase that means he just enjoyed watching a blood sport. He enjoyed watching living creatures being killed. If that isnt sociopathic behavior I dont know what is. I think it would be far better to say he was betting money on it than to say he just enjoyed the bloodlust. Money I can understand....the lust for killing is just sick. </p><p></p><p>But like I said, he cant say he gambled. It is against the NFL league rules. But you can do illegal things and come back into the NFL. Many players have committed crimes. There are tons who have been caught breaking the leagues drug policies and waltz right back in. Dont even get me started on that one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DammitJanet, post: 299181, member: 1514"] Thanks Dazed...after I wrote that it occurred to me you meant it exactly the way you just explained it. Back to Micheal Vick. I dont know for sure whose bright idea it was to stick him back in the spotlight advocating for anti-dogfighting. Whoever it was, they are idiots. Jamie knew about the bust before it went down. Vick wasnt just letting his buddies run the ring from his property or letting them board the dogs there. He knew all about it, he participated materially. He owned a majority of those dogs. He fought those dogs and he participated in the killing of those dogs. He will deny to his death that he fought those dogs for money. So I maintain that if Micheal Vick fought his dogs without fighting them for money [B]OR [/B]he stood around and just watched any dogs fight, then he is one very sick individual becuase that means he just enjoyed watching a blood sport. He enjoyed watching living creatures being killed. If that isnt sociopathic behavior I dont know what is. I think it would be far better to say he was betting money on it than to say he just enjoyed the bloodlust. Money I can understand....the lust for killing is just sick. But like I said, he cant say he gambled. It is against the NFL league rules. But you can do illegal things and come back into the NFL. Many players have committed crimes. There are tons who have been caught breaking the leagues drug policies and waltz right back in. Dont even get me started on that one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
New PETA ad...
Top