Dun Haddit
Member
We provided some very compelling evidence our son needs an IEP. All the testing the school did SHOWED he does meet the requirement for an IEP for OHI, but denied the request entirely because he did not need all the requirements for ED/SED - we specifically asked for accommodation for any or all categories.
We are requesting an IEE, but may opt for a 504 to run concurrent to the IEE, make a final decision after the results are back.
Of course, his high academics were the primary reason for denial, and since his behavior is different NOW v when we requested the evaluation, they feel his current behavior is enough to warrant denial to set him in a structured environment to prevent the behaviors from resurfacing.
The fact that we are just starting the school year and he is still in the predatory phase doesn't have any impact. He is still feeling out which teachers he can manipulate. We did get it in writing that he MUST be observed eating lunch. He throws the sack lunch away then obsesses over 'friends' lunches, often mooching from them for their food. This WAS observed by the school psychologist on several occasions. She never saw him eat lunches he was sent to school with - that's because I continue to find these lunches rotting in various areas of his room or under his bed.
In most areas of the testing, the cut that was considered at risk, his scores were within just a few points, all being very consistent with his qualifying for ED, like horseshoes and hand grenades, close enough didn't cut it.
To ensure his assignments are graded appropriately, it's in writing that assignments must be turned in as assigned, graded according to syllabi standards, late work will never be given full credit and neither will poor quality work. He knew who he could manipulate to cry and give a sob story to and those teachers would take the work and give him full credit even if piss poor or way past deadline.
This was the first evaluation/IEP meeting in 20 years that was at capacity for attendees. We asked for the meeting to be recorded. Previous phone conversations with the assistant superintendent proved to us that he is not a man of his word, so all communication will be in writing and all phone calls will be followed up in writing. This particular gentlemen seems to think charter schools are above state and federal law. Every time I have him incorrect, he continues to persist in the grandiose idea that he can skirt laws, try to find loopholes, or think that I know nothing of Special Education laws and can be bullied. Boy, is he wrong. He also needs to stop violating my son's rights in emails - doesn't he know an email is a legal document?
Sent using ConductDisorders mobile app
We are requesting an IEE, but may opt for a 504 to run concurrent to the IEE, make a final decision after the results are back.
Of course, his high academics were the primary reason for denial, and since his behavior is different NOW v when we requested the evaluation, they feel his current behavior is enough to warrant denial to set him in a structured environment to prevent the behaviors from resurfacing.
The fact that we are just starting the school year and he is still in the predatory phase doesn't have any impact. He is still feeling out which teachers he can manipulate. We did get it in writing that he MUST be observed eating lunch. He throws the sack lunch away then obsesses over 'friends' lunches, often mooching from them for their food. This WAS observed by the school psychologist on several occasions. She never saw him eat lunches he was sent to school with - that's because I continue to find these lunches rotting in various areas of his room or under his bed.
In most areas of the testing, the cut that was considered at risk, his scores were within just a few points, all being very consistent with his qualifying for ED, like horseshoes and hand grenades, close enough didn't cut it.
To ensure his assignments are graded appropriately, it's in writing that assignments must be turned in as assigned, graded according to syllabi standards, late work will never be given full credit and neither will poor quality work. He knew who he could manipulate to cry and give a sob story to and those teachers would take the work and give him full credit even if piss poor or way past deadline.
This was the first evaluation/IEP meeting in 20 years that was at capacity for attendees. We asked for the meeting to be recorded. Previous phone conversations with the assistant superintendent proved to us that he is not a man of his word, so all communication will be in writing and all phone calls will be followed up in writing. This particular gentlemen seems to think charter schools are above state and federal law. Every time I have him incorrect, he continues to persist in the grandiose idea that he can skirt laws, try to find loopholes, or think that I know nothing of Special Education laws and can be bullied. Boy, is he wrong. He also needs to stop violating my son's rights in emails - doesn't he know an email is a legal document?
Sent using ConductDisorders mobile app