Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaisyFace" data-source="post: 443310" data-attributes="member: 6546"><p>If you are responding to my post...</p><p></p><p>I mean, she could have been sentenced for "not protecting" under the logic that SHE had custody of the child at the time of death or disappearance. Then any particular scenario would not have to be proven - just that Casey did not act the way a reasonable person would have behaved if they were protecting a child.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaisyFace, post: 443310, member: 6546"] If you are responding to my post... I mean, she could have been sentenced for "not protecting" under the logic that SHE had custody of the child at the time of death or disappearance. Then any particular scenario would not have to be proven - just that Casey did not act the way a reasonable person would have behaved if they were protecting a child. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
Top