Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 443567" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>Didn't that alt juror also tell one neswcaster something like he thought most the jurors just thought it had been a terrible accident (meaning maybe no crime was committed) and that there was nothing the prosecution presented that linked Casey to a crime but if no crime was committed and nothing obvious presented, there wasn't any need to consider anything more? So, if I'm speeding on the road, accidentally hit a car or a person, flee and hide and lie about it until someone catches me and takes me to court, no crime has been committed at all- it was all just an accident so there's no point in even deliberating about whether or not I committed it? And if someone in my family knew I'd done this, or speculated that I did, that makes me not guilty?</p><p></p><p>I think presumption of innocence is one thing but being unable to think a young mother could possibly commit such a horrible crime is another. Talk about denial! And yes, MWM, if this had been a grown man and not a close blood relative, he'd have been tossed in the prison and the key thrown away.</p><p></p><p>I just got home (worked thru lunch today) and heard Zanny's attny just delievered a civil suit so Casey can't plead the 5th on this one. Of course, if you don't care about whether or not you lie or tell the truth I guess that doesn't matter. However, I wonder if it means she has to stay in that jurisdiction or what happens if she flees?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 443567, member: 3699"] Didn't that alt juror also tell one neswcaster something like he thought most the jurors just thought it had been a terrible accident (meaning maybe no crime was committed) and that there was nothing the prosecution presented that linked Casey to a crime but if no crime was committed and nothing obvious presented, there wasn't any need to consider anything more? So, if I'm speeding on the road, accidentally hit a car or a person, flee and hide and lie about it until someone catches me and takes me to court, no crime has been committed at all- it was all just an accident so there's no point in even deliberating about whether or not I committed it? And if someone in my family knew I'd done this, or speculated that I did, that makes me not guilty? I think presumption of innocence is one thing but being unable to think a young mother could possibly commit such a horrible crime is another. Talk about denial! And yes, MWM, if this had been a grown man and not a close blood relative, he'd have been tossed in the prison and the key thrown away. I just got home (worked thru lunch today) and heard Zanny's attny just delievered a civil suit so Casey can't plead the 5th on this one. Of course, if you don't care about whether or not you lie or tell the truth I guess that doesn't matter. However, I wonder if it means she has to stay in that jurisdiction or what happens if she flees? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
Top