Thanks for the advice. Yes I think certain things like training with the pictures needs to be addressed in the IEP with specific dates. I think a new IEP is in order for that.
One thing that I came across today in researching is my state stipulates that a developmental delay eligibilty can be used at the districts discretion, but only if the child doesnt qualify under any other eligibilty critera. So he would qualify under autism yet the district still uses developmental delay. Seems not be right by the states regs. I know you say it doesnt matter, but makes me wonder why they are doing this. Maybe I am paranoid but something is not adding up here. On paperwork maybe this slides by as services are appropiate under daughter yet they know they are not under autism.