Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
For those watching the Casey A. trial.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 439574" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>Those are good points, DDD, and one commentator addressed them by saying he (Baez) could and should have approached the defense theory exactly as you suggested, however, he bcaked himself in a corner with running with the story about abuse (as you and DJ pointed out), so now what's he going to do? If he switches approaches/theories now, it does Casey in because the jury would never buy that she didn't kill Caylee, I don't think.</p><p></p><p>A commentator also mentioned something I find very interesting- apparently Casey was evaluation'd by at least one psychiatric but if the defense called the psychiatric who evaluation'd her to the stand, the judge said Ashton would be allowed to question the psychiatric about other things the psychiatric found out or determined about Casey, and after learning that, Baez withdrew the psychiatric from his witness list. That to me, says a WHOLE lot, but unfortunately it's another factor the jury won't know until after trial. </p><p></p><p>I was trying to read up on what was testified to today and read that an expert said three pairs of shoes from the home had silt or dirt on them similar to that found around Caylee's remains- who did these shoes belong to?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 439574, member: 3699"] Those are good points, DDD, and one commentator addressed them by saying he (Baez) could and should have approached the defense theory exactly as you suggested, however, he bcaked himself in a corner with running with the story about abuse (as you and DJ pointed out), so now what's he going to do? If he switches approaches/theories now, it does Casey in because the jury would never buy that she didn't kill Caylee, I don't think. A commentator also mentioned something I find very interesting- apparently Casey was evaluation'd by at least one psychiatric but if the defense called the psychiatric who evaluation'd her to the stand, the judge said Ashton would be allowed to question the psychiatric about other things the psychiatric found out or determined about Casey, and after learning that, Baez withdrew the psychiatric from his witness list. That to me, says a WHOLE lot, but unfortunately it's another factor the jury won't know until after trial. I was trying to read up on what was testified to today and read that an expert said three pairs of shoes from the home had silt or dirt on them similar to that found around Caylee's remains- who did these shoes belong to? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
For those watching the Casey A. trial.....
Top