Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
I have an excellent idea to keep kids safer! update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiapet" data-source="post: 556444" data-attributes="member: 455"><p>There is a school that is doing something like this but not quite. I have long ago thought about this. The objection comes in from the world often of the "big brother" thought. That we would be traveling down that path. Now I'm all for securing our children and yes, we could ever remove said thing as when I thought about it I was thinking more along the lines of like the pet id since, as you pointed out, the children often get stripped of personal clothing or items so "any" item is bound to not be worth having on them. As you see backpacks, water bottle, hats, clothing, etc, all end up being found but no child. That's why I thought it would have to be imbedded in the skin and hopefully not something that could float around like norplant did or other objects that have either (how come petid's don't?).</p><p></p><p>I just don't know but what "I" feel, irregardless of the "big brother" thought, put it in a child until they turn 18 when they can remove. I'm sure Joe Walsh would have wished for it as well as countless other families who have lived through horrible tragedies with their children, those who still have missing children, and those who will have children go missing. JMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiapet, post: 556444, member: 455"] There is a school that is doing something like this but not quite. I have long ago thought about this. The objection comes in from the world often of the "big brother" thought. That we would be traveling down that path. Now I'm all for securing our children and yes, we could ever remove said thing as when I thought about it I was thinking more along the lines of like the pet id since, as you pointed out, the children often get stripped of personal clothing or items so "any" item is bound to not be worth having on them. As you see backpacks, water bottle, hats, clothing, etc, all end up being found but no child. That's why I thought it would have to be imbedded in the skin and hopefully not something that could float around like norplant did or other objects that have either (how come petid's don't?). I just don't know but what "I" feel, irregardless of the "big brother" thought, put it in a child until they turn 18 when they can remove. I'm sure Joe Walsh would have wished for it as well as countless other families who have lived through horrible tragedies with their children, those who still have missing children, and those who will have children go missing. JMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
I have an excellent idea to keep kids safer! update
Top