Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
I would like people's opinions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Malika" data-source="post: 555821" data-attributes="member: 11227"><p>Oh dear... this is a real consensus! I don't know that he would go as far as suing us, but I know I fear it. </p><p>It raises a larger question for me, I guess. Do ideas actually belong to people and can that be proven? What I mean is, my friend and I have done this man's courses. We ourselves recognise much of his work as truthful, as reflecting a reality. If I state those same ideas, but loosely, in a kind of general way, can it really be said that they are "his"?</p><p>I suspect that this area of litigation to do with intellectual property is quite controversial and probably not straightforward. </p><p>I know we cannot really do without this network of insights and I know I'd really much rather have him on side. He is supposed to be a convinced Christian, supposed to be dedicated to helping people (and I believe part of him really is) and I remain saddened and baffled - I know, I know, human nature - as to why it all gets so complicated. I have the utmost respect for his work and want to acknowledge him!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Malika, post: 555821, member: 11227"] Oh dear... this is a real consensus! I don't know that he would go as far as suing us, but I know I fear it. It raises a larger question for me, I guess. Do ideas actually belong to people and can that be proven? What I mean is, my friend and I have done this man's courses. We ourselves recognise much of his work as truthful, as reflecting a reality. If I state those same ideas, but loosely, in a kind of general way, can it really be said that they are "his"? I suspect that this area of litigation to do with intellectual property is quite controversial and probably not straightforward. I know we cannot really do without this network of insights and I know I'd really much rather have him on side. He is supposed to be a convinced Christian, supposed to be dedicated to helping people (and I believe part of him really is) and I remain saddened and baffled - I know, I know, human nature - as to why it all gets so complicated. I have the utmost respect for his work and want to acknowledge him! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
I would like people's opinions
Top