Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
OJ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="witzend" data-source="post: 77512" data-attributes="member: 99"><p><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JoG</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And, it was also stated just yesterday that it is believed that there are many people who have been stewing about him being a free man and set him up so that he'd ultimately be behind bars for SOMETHING! </div></div></p><p></p><p>Maybe so, but it's OJ you hear screaming orders around. He didn't <em>have to</em> do it. We all have free will. Even OJ. </p><p></p><p>If it gets that far, it will be a criminal trial so the standard will be "beyond reasonable doubt" (you can think for a moment maybe he didn't do it and still find him guilty), not a civil trial where it would "preponderance of the evidence" (more likely than not". Hopefully his jury will be able to figure that out this time...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="witzend, post: 77512, member: 99"] <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JoG</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And, it was also stated just yesterday that it is believed that there are many people who have been stewing about him being a free man and set him up so that he'd ultimately be behind bars for SOMETHING! </div></div> Maybe so, but it's OJ you hear screaming orders around. He didn't [i]have to[/i] do it. We all have free will. Even OJ. If it gets that far, it will be a criminal trial so the standard will be "beyond reasonable doubt" (you can think for a moment maybe he didn't do it and still find him guilty), not a civil trial where it would "preponderance of the evidence" (more likely than not". Hopefully his jury will be able to figure that out this time... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
OJ...
Top