Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Registry for Child Abusers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AnnieO" data-source="post: 403807" data-attributes="member: 6705"><p>I have mixed emotions about this, simply because of all the false allegations that have been leveled by BM. At one point (husband has documentaiton), he asked for her to be investigated, and took proof. Well, the proof (audio and video) was destroyed (we still have copies... husband isn't stupid), and he was told if he didn't "just go away and leave the poor woman alone" that <em>he</em> would be up on charges for abuse. One SW told him he should just give up and let her have custody. There are good SWs and bad, just like the rest of the population.</p><p> </p><p>Problem is, it's so easy to manufacture evidence. Kids would go home without a scratch on them, next thing cops would be at our home regarding setting Jett on fire (huh? Even doctor's report couldn't justify that one), beating the kids, etc. So they had marks now? HOW? Oh yeah. BM had to have proof.</p><p> </p><p>on the other hand, if one is <em>convicted</em> - no question, no doubt - then okay.</p><p> </p><p>Like I said, mixed thoughts...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AnnieO, post: 403807, member: 6705"] I have mixed emotions about this, simply because of all the false allegations that have been leveled by BM. At one point (husband has documentaiton), he asked for her to be investigated, and took proof. Well, the proof (audio and video) was destroyed (we still have copies... husband isn't stupid), and he was told if he didn't "just go away and leave the poor woman alone" that [I]he[/I] would be up on charges for abuse. One SW told him he should just give up and let her have custody. There are good SWs and bad, just like the rest of the population. Problem is, it's so easy to manufacture evidence. Kids would go home without a scratch on them, next thing cops would be at our home regarding setting Jett on fire (huh? Even doctor's report couldn't justify that one), beating the kids, etc. So they had marks now? HOW? Oh yeah. BM had to have proof. on the other hand, if one is [I]convicted[/I] - no question, no doubt - then okay. Like I said, mixed thoughts... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Registry for Child Abusers?
Top