Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Roe vs. Wade for Men (?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hearts and roses" data-source="post: 95209" data-attributes="member: 2211"><p>As much as I hate to admit it, he has a very strong point, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>I used to feel that it's his tough noogies. Since the woman is the one who has to deal with the pregnancy/birth and after care, not mention what pregnancy and birth do to a woman's body, the the final decision should be the woman's. </p><p></p><p>However, in his case, he only went ahead with the sexual encounter sans condom because she assured him there was no way she could get pregnant. And then, voila!, she's pregnant. </p><p></p><p>Who is to say this wasn't a case of entrapment?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hearts and roses, post: 95209, member: 2211"] As much as I hate to admit it, he has a very strong point, in my opinion. I used to feel that it's his tough noogies. Since the woman is the one who has to deal with the pregnancy/birth and after care, not mention what pregnancy and birth do to a woman's body, the the final decision should be the woman's. However, in his case, he only went ahead with the sexual encounter sans condom because she assured him there was no way she could get pregnant. And then, voila!, she's pregnant. Who is to say this wasn't a case of entrapment? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Roe vs. Wade for Men (?)
Top