Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
SD response to Legal Advocate letter/requests.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsaneCdn" data-source="post: 515372" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>A few thoughts... numbers relate to the numbered items in your post above.</p><p>Overall? Remember, they don't DARE do an apology. Their legal crew won't let them - that would be an admission of guilt. Beyond that? Brick by brick, they are building the case against themselves... it just isn't as fast as the rest of us would like. I'm sure your advocate is quite pleased with this particular communication...</p><p></p><p>1. They might as well admit this - it will come out in a court case anyway. But... it makes the whole district look bad, not just this person. Obviously, certification isn't something that this SD puts much value on... (oops!)</p><p></p><p>2. This adds to the picture that they are trying SO hard to not admit... but, they aren't psychopaths... so, like most of us, they leak bits of highly relevant info, a little at a time. This paragraph alone is quite revealing, but in conjunction with the rest of the evidence? very useful.</p><p></p><p></p><p>3. I'm guessing the problem is WAY more than an issue with training on restraints... it's a problem with a whole approach toward challenging kids. Statements like this help demonstrate that the problem isn't a rogue principal and school psychiatric... it is the whole SD. Which means... there's no way you can trust a program like SUN in THIS district. (more ammo for your case for specialized placement)</p><p></p><p>5. They aren't fighting you on using homebound... and if you can find a way to make use of more of it, they will support that too... or at least, they are on record now with that statement.</p><p></p><p>And then they essentially have said that if where you end up wanting to place Q is in this other expensive option... they will support that too... </p><p></p><p>The whole "training" thing? Totally wrong track. Yes, there needs to be people in the schools who know how to do the restraints properly... but more than that, there needs to be an approach to handling these kids that is far more logical, far more proactive, far more positive... THAT is the training that is really needed. And nobody at the SD gets that, <em>yet.</em> They might be forced to, by the time you and your team are done with them...!</p><p></p><p>I'm guessing the advocate already has the court case building in her head... but won't pull the trigger prematurely.</p><p></p><p>Hopefully, Q has some good riding time tomorrow and you get a bit of a break. Maybe you need to go riding too?!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsaneCdn, post: 515372, member: 11791"] A few thoughts... numbers relate to the numbered items in your post above. Overall? Remember, they don't DARE do an apology. Their legal crew won't let them - that would be an admission of guilt. Beyond that? Brick by brick, they are building the case against themselves... it just isn't as fast as the rest of us would like. I'm sure your advocate is quite pleased with this particular communication... 1. They might as well admit this - it will come out in a court case anyway. But... it makes the whole district look bad, not just this person. Obviously, certification isn't something that this SD puts much value on... (oops!) 2. This adds to the picture that they are trying SO hard to not admit... but, they aren't psychopaths... so, like most of us, they leak bits of highly relevant info, a little at a time. This paragraph alone is quite revealing, but in conjunction with the rest of the evidence? very useful. 3. I'm guessing the problem is WAY more than an issue with training on restraints... it's a problem with a whole approach toward challenging kids. Statements like this help demonstrate that the problem isn't a rogue principal and school psychiatric... it is the whole SD. Which means... there's no way you can trust a program like SUN in THIS district. (more ammo for your case for specialized placement) 5. They aren't fighting you on using homebound... and if you can find a way to make use of more of it, they will support that too... or at least, they are on record now with that statement. And then they essentially have said that if where you end up wanting to place Q is in this other expensive option... they will support that too... The whole "training" thing? Totally wrong track. Yes, there needs to be people in the schools who know how to do the restraints properly... but more than that, there needs to be an approach to handling these kids that is far more logical, far more proactive, far more positive... THAT is the training that is really needed. And nobody at the SD gets that, [I]yet.[/I] They might be forced to, by the time you and your team are done with them...! I'm guessing the advocate already has the court case building in her head... but won't pull the trigger prematurely. Hopefully, Q has some good riding time tomorrow and you get a bit of a break. Maybe you need to go riding too?! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
SD response to Legal Advocate letter/requests.....
Top