Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Sent home again...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shari" data-source="post: 345029" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p>One thing they are gonna holler about, tho, if I push them to make changes to keep him...Safe Schools Act. </p><p> </p><p>Any suggestions on how to respond to that? They say they "have" to suspend Wee because of the safe schools act. I say BS, because in the safe school's act, there is a provision just for this reason, that the incident can be overlooked if there are extenuating circumstances. I beleive, in this instance, they are suspending him to make their jobs easier, and keep all the "typical" parents happy, but I need a good come back for that argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shari, post: 345029, member: 1848"] One thing they are gonna holler about, tho, if I push them to make changes to keep him...Safe Schools Act. Any suggestions on how to respond to that? They say they "have" to suspend Wee because of the safe schools act. I say BS, because in the safe school's act, there is a provision just for this reason, that the incident can be overlooked if there are extenuating circumstances. I beleive, in this instance, they are suspending him to make their jobs easier, and keep all the "typical" parents happy, but I need a good come back for that argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Sent home again...
Top