Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DammitJanet" data-source="post: 443302" data-attributes="member: 1514"><p>Malika, I think you may have some sort of different way of viewing things simply because you are from another country or maybe because you hold out for the underdog...not sure which. Or maybe its because your son is 4 and you havent had to deal with the justice system like some of the others of us have. Im not really sure but you really seem to see this whole thing through rose colored glasses. </p><p></p><p>Star...I know you think you are right and maybe you are but I just dont know. I am furious over this entire thing. I think justice has been bought in this case. I do not believe George had a daggone thing to do with any of it. None. I think it was all Cindy, Casey and the Defense if it was anyone. I fully believe the only reason the verdict was not guilty was two fold...one I think someone (s) were paid off and two...a couple of the jurors had upcoming plans and they didnt want to keep voting so they took the easy way out. </p><p></p><p>Also...why should she get off easy on the number of years for lying to the cops? She was arrested and convicted for 6 counts of check fraud and got 6 felonies so she should be serving time on those felonies which should be H felonies carrying up to 18 months each. Add on a year each for lying to the cops...that could be more time. So she could be in for at least 10 years. Why not give her that? She has been in for almost 3...have her serve another 7.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DammitJanet, post: 443302, member: 1514"] Malika, I think you may have some sort of different way of viewing things simply because you are from another country or maybe because you hold out for the underdog...not sure which. Or maybe its because your son is 4 and you havent had to deal with the justice system like some of the others of us have. Im not really sure but you really seem to see this whole thing through rose colored glasses. Star...I know you think you are right and maybe you are but I just dont know. I am furious over this entire thing. I think justice has been bought in this case. I do not believe George had a daggone thing to do with any of it. None. I think it was all Cindy, Casey and the Defense if it was anyone. I fully believe the only reason the verdict was not guilty was two fold...one I think someone (s) were paid off and two...a couple of the jurors had upcoming plans and they didnt want to keep voting so they took the easy way out. Also...why should she get off easy on the number of years for lying to the cops? She was arrested and convicted for 6 counts of check fraud and got 6 felonies so she should be serving time on those felonies which should be H felonies carrying up to 18 months each. Add on a year each for lying to the cops...that could be more time. So she could be in for at least 10 years. Why not give her that? She has been in for almost 3...have her serve another 7. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
Top