Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
When you don't sign the iep
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheOnlyMe" data-source="post: 221904" data-attributes="member: 4515"><p>Well I would research the law on the following links, but I was taught a few years ago by similar experience.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2006-3/081406a.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2006-3/081406a.pdf</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/iep_instruct_svcs/iep/index.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/iep_instruct_svcs/iep/index.shtml</a></p><p></p><p>I signed what I believed would be produced after the paperwork was filled out, based on the discussion which was conducted. Upon receipt of the hard copy it was not correct, and it took me many times on the merry go around to get it corrected. So I was advised by mentor Advocate, <strong>to sign for attendance purpose only</strong>, and once I review the hard copy I would sign I agree. Last year, the head of Diag's for the SD, was at an ARD and told my school they could put a statement in the deliberations stating, <strong>"Parent agrees with the ARDC as was proposed and discussed, until she is able to review the documents."</strong></p><p></p><p>Though recently while advocating in another district an assistant principle pulled a power play with pressure and stated if the parent did as I suggested him to (as above) they would have to reconvene the ARDC and no services would change until the reconvened ARD. I looked it up and found out he was misinformed, which the parent was glad he had conceded to the reconvene, because there were some errors in the final documents. I look at the paperwork like a contract which it is considered a legal binding document and any information which is incorrect, the parent has the right as an equal member of the committee to ensure it is as was discussed and correct.</p><p></p><p>I just received my son's ARD paperwork today and reviewed and they had made a typo saying he was to graduate this year when he is a junior, and he is not scheduled to graduate until next year. I look at it like this the recorder is attempting to listen so has to type the deliberations and when she fills out the other papers, there is room for human error. So I will be getting in contact with her next week to address the issues I found upon review to get them corrected.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheOnlyMe, post: 221904, member: 4515"] Well I would research the law on the following links, but I was taught a few years ago by similar experience. [url]http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2006-3/081406a.pdf[/url] [url]http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/iep_instruct_svcs/iep/index.shtml[/url] I signed what I believed would be produced after the paperwork was filled out, based on the discussion which was conducted. Upon receipt of the hard copy it was not correct, and it took me many times on the merry go around to get it corrected. So I was advised by mentor Advocate, [B]to sign for attendance purpose only[/B], and once I review the hard copy I would sign I agree. Last year, the head of Diag's for the SD, was at an ARD and told my school they could put a statement in the deliberations stating, [B]"Parent agrees with the ARDC as was proposed and discussed, until she is able to review the documents."[/B] Though recently while advocating in another district an assistant principle pulled a power play with pressure and stated if the parent did as I suggested him to (as above) they would have to reconvene the ARDC and no services would change until the reconvened ARD. I looked it up and found out he was misinformed, which the parent was glad he had conceded to the reconvene, because there were some errors in the final documents. I look at the paperwork like a contract which it is considered a legal binding document and any information which is incorrect, the parent has the right as an equal member of the committee to ensure it is as was discussed and correct. I just received my son's ARD paperwork today and reviewed and they had made a typo saying he was to graduate this year when he is a junior, and he is not scheduled to graduate until next year. I look at it like this the recorder is attempting to listen so has to type the deliberations and when she fills out the other papers, there is room for human error. So I will be getting in contact with her next week to address the issues I found upon review to get them corrected. Hope this helps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Special Ed 101
When you don't sign the iep
Top