Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Can anyone interpret test results? (Long and boring)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsaneCdn" data-source="post: 440581" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>Hi, this is "Out-on-a-limb" again...</p><p>These are the ones I know anything about...</p><p></p><p>VCI 87 - vocab stuff - this is low relative to the rest of her scores, in this sequence.</p><p>PRI 104</p><p>WMI 94</p><p>PSI 103</p><p>FSIO 95</p><p></p><p>This set, scores are I believe from 1 to 19 with 10 being the "norm".</p><p>Voc 9</p><p>Sim 8</p><p>Comp 6 ** comprehension - this is low</p><p>BD 9</p><p>PicConcept 16 ** visual processing - this is very high</p><p>MR 7</p><p>DS 9</p><p>LNS 9</p><p>Coding 10</p><p>SS 11</p><p>(are we surprised yet?)</p><p></p><p>WIAT-III</p><p>Math Prblm Slv 87 ** biggest problem in math, is word problems... hmmm.</p><p>Numerical Ops 92</p><p>Math Fl-Add 117</p><p>Math Fl-Sub 96</p><p>Math Fl-Mult 97</p><p></p><p>Brief Parent - scores 65 and above are considered "significant"</p><p>Inhibit 44 (this causes lots of the typical ADHD behaviors)</p><p>Shift 38 (ditto)</p><p>Em. Control 37 (ditto)</p><p>Initiate 56 - elevated, but not clinically significant</p><p>Wrk Memory 66 ** clinically significant</p><p>Plan/Orgnze 65 ** clinically significant</p><p>Org. Mtrls. 71 **clinically significant</p><p>Monitor 53</p><p></p><p>(don't remember what these 3 are...)</p><p>BRI 38</p><p>MI 66 clinically significant</p><p>GEC 55</p><p></p><p>So, we've got... a highly visual learner with comprehension issues, working memory and organizational challenges - and no behavior issues.</p><p>NOT... ADHD, for example. I can see why the NS has a trouble coming up with a LABEL.</p><p></p><p>But, These ARE significant findings. NS should be able to document the clinically significant findings, and the accommodations needed. This includes... alternate exam formats (including oral, scribed, multiple-choice/short-answer, etc.), alternative learning formats (NOT lectures!), etc.</p><p></p><p>Given the significance of vocab scores, etc. - have you considered having her tested for auditory processing issues? May not be Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) per se, but something in that range? This wouldn't be a NS test - usually Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) or Speech Language Pathologist (SLP)+audiology</p><p></p><p>Hope I haven't confused everything... sorry that some of the tests are not familiar, but I think you're getting a fairly accurate result.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsaneCdn, post: 440581, member: 11791"] Hi, this is "Out-on-a-limb" again... These are the ones I know anything about... VCI 87 - vocab stuff - this is low relative to the rest of her scores, in this sequence. PRI 104 WMI 94 PSI 103 FSIO 95 This set, scores are I believe from 1 to 19 with 10 being the "norm". Voc 9 Sim 8 Comp 6 ** comprehension - this is low BD 9 PicConcept 16 ** visual processing - this is very high MR 7 DS 9 LNS 9 Coding 10 SS 11 (are we surprised yet?) WIAT-III Math Prblm Slv 87 ** biggest problem in math, is word problems... hmmm. Numerical Ops 92 Math Fl-Add 117 Math Fl-Sub 96 Math Fl-Mult 97 Brief Parent - scores 65 and above are considered "significant" Inhibit 44 (this causes lots of the typical ADHD behaviors) Shift 38 (ditto) Em. Control 37 (ditto) Initiate 56 - elevated, but not clinically significant Wrk Memory 66 ** clinically significant Plan/Orgnze 65 ** clinically significant Org. Mtrls. 71 **clinically significant Monitor 53 (don't remember what these 3 are...) BRI 38 MI 66 clinically significant GEC 55 So, we've got... a highly visual learner with comprehension issues, working memory and organizational challenges - and no behavior issues. NOT... ADHD, for example. I can see why the NS has a trouble coming up with a LABEL. But, These ARE significant findings. NS should be able to document the clinically significant findings, and the accommodations needed. This includes... alternate exam formats (including oral, scribed, multiple-choice/short-answer, etc.), alternative learning formats (NOT lectures!), etc. Given the significance of vocab scores, etc. - have you considered having her tested for auditory processing issues? May not be Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) per se, but something in that range? This wouldn't be a NS test - usually Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) or Speech Language Pathologist (SLP)+audiology Hope I haven't confused everything... sorry that some of the tests are not familiar, but I think you're getting a fairly accurate result. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Can anyone interpret test results? (Long and boring)
Top