Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
husband thinking problems
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hound dog" data-source="post: 528237" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>I think someone cloned my husband. </p><p></p><p>MY husband..........would carry on like that up until the point of being physically in the court room. Then?? He'd clam up and let me do all the talking. Now, at worst, he might mumble under his breath or make faces.......but he rarely carried out anything he threatened to do beforehand, actually.......he never did. Once I figured this out? I just let him rant. I figured he needed to rant.......and let it run in one ear and out the other. Often I agreed with him, sometimes not. But being in a room of strangers, let alone one with significant power.......made him clam up. (at least the military taught him that much lol )</p><p></p><p>He does have a valid point, however. And I wonder if perhaps you explain it to Mr Lawyer, if he could see if he can do anything with it. I know that if I worked.........no matter how far behind husband was in child support (he really wasn't, Missouri was giving us hades), they couldn't touch my income OR count it as income to base child support off of. Because katie is not my child and I am not responsible for her financial well being. So........in some odd way, perhaps Mr. Lawyer could find a way to make that work in reverse. X is not your husband's X, technically he is not responsible for the financial welfare of children not his bio kids. (yes, I know realistically he is, but we're talking legally) You don't work, therefore have no income. Are you getting the jest of what I'm saying?</p><p></p><p>See, once I was taken to court for non payment of a bill that went into collection. I was fighting it because I'd been paying the doctor what I could afford to pay (trust me not much) and he sent it to collection anyway. Peeved me off, so I refused to pay the collection co. I explain this to the judge/mediator. No, I had no job and no income. Lawyer for the debt collector had a fit and said that there was income because husband worked and he wanted husband's pay garnished. Judge just shook her head. Original debt was only in my name. It was not husband's debt, not his responsibility in the eyes of the court. And since I had no income, judge threw the case out and told the lawyer to tell his client he might want to re-think buying up delinquent accts from doctors. lol </p><p></p><p>husband and I were both shocked. I'd just hoped to state my case to prevent wage garnishment (we seriously couldn't afford it), I never dreamed they wouldn't hold husband responsible, I was afterall his spouse. </p><p></p><p>Maybe Mr Lawyer can't do anything with this perspective. But it doesn't hurt to ask. And then maybe husband will feel like someone has at least listened to him, even if it wasn't doable. Know what I mean??</p><p></p><p>Actually, his logic makes perfect sense. But then, I've spent nearly my entire adult life around autistics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hound dog, post: 528237, member: 84"] I think someone cloned my husband. MY husband..........would carry on like that up until the point of being physically in the court room. Then?? He'd clam up and let me do all the talking. Now, at worst, he might mumble under his breath or make faces.......but he rarely carried out anything he threatened to do beforehand, actually.......he never did. Once I figured this out? I just let him rant. I figured he needed to rant.......and let it run in one ear and out the other. Often I agreed with him, sometimes not. But being in a room of strangers, let alone one with significant power.......made him clam up. (at least the military taught him that much lol ) He does have a valid point, however. And I wonder if perhaps you explain it to Mr Lawyer, if he could see if he can do anything with it. I know that if I worked.........no matter how far behind husband was in child support (he really wasn't, Missouri was giving us hades), they couldn't touch my income OR count it as income to base child support off of. Because katie is not my child and I am not responsible for her financial well being. So........in some odd way, perhaps Mr. Lawyer could find a way to make that work in reverse. X is not your husband's X, technically he is not responsible for the financial welfare of children not his bio kids. (yes, I know realistically he is, but we're talking legally) You don't work, therefore have no income. Are you getting the jest of what I'm saying? See, once I was taken to court for non payment of a bill that went into collection. I was fighting it because I'd been paying the doctor what I could afford to pay (trust me not much) and he sent it to collection anyway. Peeved me off, so I refused to pay the collection co. I explain this to the judge/mediator. No, I had no job and no income. Lawyer for the debt collector had a fit and said that there was income because husband worked and he wanted husband's pay garnished. Judge just shook her head. Original debt was only in my name. It was not husband's debt, not his responsibility in the eyes of the court. And since I had no income, judge threw the case out and told the lawyer to tell his client he might want to re-think buying up delinquent accts from doctors. lol husband and I were both shocked. I'd just hoped to state my case to prevent wage garnishment (we seriously couldn't afford it), I never dreamed they wouldn't hold husband responsible, I was afterall his spouse. Maybe Mr Lawyer can't do anything with this perspective. But it doesn't hurt to ask. And then maybe husband will feel like someone has at least listened to him, even if it wasn't doable. Know what I mean?? Actually, his logic makes perfect sense. But then, I've spent nearly my entire adult life around autistics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
husband thinking problems
Top