Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Info from a member of the county committee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shari" data-source="post: 384108" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p>K, if I agree to this, I will already be on the defensive, because it would be the school making the referral, and they would be the ones presenting the case to the committee.</p><p> </p><p>I'm not against it, but I think the sd has an ulterior motive in it...why else would it be beneficial to seek services from agencies that I am already getting services from...? Our case mgr is voluntary...I sought that service out 5 years ago, when Wee was first diagnosis'ed. We were turned down the first time, and I appealed. I don't know how much more proactive one can be in that arena.</p><p> </p><p>They also have signed releases to talk to ALL of these people. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. We've had a round-table with Wee's DevPed....guess who put that together and footed the bill...not them. But it was at their request. I took Wee to St Louis for a second opinion from a neuro there regarding possible breakthru seizures the SpEd and para saw in the spring of last year. At their request. I just don't think this is on the up and up...</p><p> </p><p>And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they didn't know about this service and truly thougt it was something new. But I'm not really thinking so...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shari, post: 384108, member: 1848"] K, if I agree to this, I will already be on the defensive, because it would be the school making the referral, and they would be the ones presenting the case to the committee. I'm not against it, but I think the sd has an ulterior motive in it...why else would it be beneficial to seek services from agencies that I am already getting services from...? Our case mgr is voluntary...I sought that service out 5 years ago, when Wee was first diagnosis'ed. We were turned down the first time, and I appealed. I don't know how much more proactive one can be in that arena. They also have signed releases to talk to ALL of these people. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. We've had a round-table with Wee's DevPed....guess who put that together and footed the bill...not them. But it was at their request. I took Wee to St Louis for a second opinion from a neuro there regarding possible breakthru seizures the SpEd and para saw in the spring of last year. At their request. I just don't think this is on the up and up... And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they didn't know about this service and truly thougt it was something new. But I'm not really thinking so... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Info from a member of the county committee
Top