Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Light bulbs...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 342239" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>You know I used to get light bulbs that really did last a long period of time before going out. I admit that the past year or so I tried to buy the least expensive brand of most things to save money, but then I realized that my light bulbs were going out every few weeks instead of lasting months. So, I go shopping for more bulbs and about the only ones I could find were these energy savers that turned out to be 52 watts instead of 60 watts yet I'd still have to pay the same price as for a 60 watt. But the part that really gets to me is that I'm still having to change them every few weeks. What's the deal here? I think that energy saving concept is bogus when it comes to light bulbs- I might be saving energy by being forced to use a 52 instead of a 60 but it's costing me twice as much to get less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 342239, member: 3699"] You know I used to get light bulbs that really did last a long period of time before going out. I admit that the past year or so I tried to buy the least expensive brand of most things to save money, but then I realized that my light bulbs were going out every few weeks instead of lasting months. So, I go shopping for more bulbs and about the only ones I could find were these energy savers that turned out to be 52 watts instead of 60 watts yet I'd still have to pay the same price as for a 60 watt. But the part that really gets to me is that I'm still having to change them every few weeks. What's the deal here? I think that energy saving concept is bogus when it comes to light bulbs- I might be saving energy by being forced to use a 52 instead of a 60 but it's costing me twice as much to get less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Light bulbs...
Top