Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Sat. will be 2 wks since I've seen her :(
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rotsne" data-source="post: 221772" data-attributes="member: 6326"><p>Regarding raising the agelimit to 21. They can do it in Idaho where huge firms run a number of private warehouses for kids. I think that they are leading in the +18 treatment of kids. If you want to find out how they did push the laws through, you have to research a cult called Synanon. One of their top member - a certain Wasserman - left the cult before they began to cut their private parts off and created a high school chain called CEDU after <em>Charles E. Dederich University.</em> Because one of their intake school was located in California a lot of your favorite TV-stars parked their children there. Even a popular TV-host who retired last year with shows about problems in families had a daughter in Idaho. I think that he rescued a woman in a traffic accident while driving up there, which is quiet impressive because he is ill.</p><p></p><p>Many became 18 during their stay, but the parents then went to court and got an extention to the juvenile status of their child. The original owners are gone, but those private jails are now owned by one of the largest hospital chains in country, so I guess an extention of parenthood is still possible in Idaho.</p><p></p><p>Bran, if the situation was different and it was you who had kicked her out, the technical expression for such an act would have been an Exit-plan. This strategy invented by one of the largest therapeutic boarding school systems in the states is a kind of tough love. When the kid turns 18, there are two choices. Completing the program or being sent down to the nearest shelter, <em>but not in the hometown but in the town where the boarding school is</em>, which often is out of state. I think that is cruel and I understand why parents have to go through a lot of seminars to prepare themselves on such an act.</p><p></p><p>As stated in a previous post, our children are survivors. But after 3-4 weeks on their own they cannot live of their friends anymore and have to take a job or cave in. Then the strategy is claimed to be working.</p><p></p><p>I have been thinking about if it would help having the agelimit raised to 21. I don't think so. Instead I would fight to have any responsibility put on parents due to act made by 18-21 years removed. Because we cannot control them we should not have any financial burden due to their actions on us either.</p><p></p><p>Bran. I guess that she will surface in some 3-4 weeks. If the rumor number 2 is correct she is living at a friend and she will be in the same situation as the kids on a Exit-plan. Normally the solution would be to take some kind of a job, a bagger in a supermarket or in a fast-food-chain, but she cannot take a job because then the police will locate her. She has no option but to report herself to the police or to you. But have you thought about what the second step is. The first is very clear. She will end up in jail, but then...</p><p></p><p>She cannot be in jail forever and how many months can the creditcard theft and assult amount themselves to?</p><p></p><p>Do you want her back or should she attend a Residential Treatment Center (RTC) where they will let her go rather quickly because she is an adult?</p><p></p><p>I would try to reach her and try to get the charges dropped in exchange for her to live where she is now but a possibility to get a job.</p><p></p><p>I hope that your daughter remains OK. Give her the time to decide what to do and use your time on your son.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rotsne, post: 221772, member: 6326"] Regarding raising the agelimit to 21. They can do it in Idaho where huge firms run a number of private warehouses for kids. I think that they are leading in the +18 treatment of kids. If you want to find out how they did push the laws through, you have to research a cult called Synanon. One of their top member - a certain Wasserman - left the cult before they began to cut their private parts off and created a high school chain called CEDU after [I]Charles E. Dederich University.[/I] Because one of their intake school was located in California a lot of your favorite TV-stars parked their children there. Even a popular TV-host who retired last year with shows about problems in families had a daughter in Idaho. I think that he rescued a woman in a traffic accident while driving up there, which is quiet impressive because he is ill. Many became 18 during their stay, but the parents then went to court and got an extention to the juvenile status of their child. The original owners are gone, but those private jails are now owned by one of the largest hospital chains in country, so I guess an extention of parenthood is still possible in Idaho. Bran, if the situation was different and it was you who had kicked her out, the technical expression for such an act would have been an Exit-plan. This strategy invented by one of the largest therapeutic boarding school systems in the states is a kind of tough love. When the kid turns 18, there are two choices. Completing the program or being sent down to the nearest shelter, [I]but not in the hometown but in the town where the boarding school is[/I], which often is out of state. I think that is cruel and I understand why parents have to go through a lot of seminars to prepare themselves on such an act. As stated in a previous post, our children are survivors. But after 3-4 weeks on their own they cannot live of their friends anymore and have to take a job or cave in. Then the strategy is claimed to be working. I have been thinking about if it would help having the agelimit raised to 21. I don't think so. Instead I would fight to have any responsibility put on parents due to act made by 18-21 years removed. Because we cannot control them we should not have any financial burden due to their actions on us either. Bran. I guess that she will surface in some 3-4 weeks. If the rumor number 2 is correct she is living at a friend and she will be in the same situation as the kids on a Exit-plan. Normally the solution would be to take some kind of a job, a bagger in a supermarket or in a fast-food-chain, but she cannot take a job because then the police will locate her. She has no option but to report herself to the police or to you. But have you thought about what the second step is. The first is very clear. She will end up in jail, but then... She cannot be in jail forever and how many months can the creditcard theft and assult amount themselves to? Do you want her back or should she attend a Residential Treatment Center (RTC) where they will let her go rather quickly because she is an adult? I would try to reach her and try to get the charges dropped in exchange for her to live where she is now but a possibility to get a job. I hope that your daughter remains OK. Give her the time to decide what to do and use your time on your son. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Sat. will be 2 wks since I've seen her :(
Top