Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Spent all day at DHR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="susiestar" data-source="post: 502612" data-attributes="member: 1233"><p>I know many are hesitant to seek out private firms who will enforce child support, but they ARE an option. They take an amount of the BACK support owed but they also make SURE that support is kept current. I know a few people who went that route because they figured they were NEVER going to see a penny of any support so if the private company could get anything it was better than nothing. They all seemed to have a good experience and did not begrudge the amt they paid the company - I think it was 30%. As one friend said, 30% of nothing is nothing, and so is 70% of nothing. I at least get that 70% and it is a heck of a lot more than I had before.</p><p></p><p>I am NOT saying that you need to do this, just that it is an option. I think men who do not pay child support are scum. NOT men who are disabled and CANNOT, but men who hide their assets and refuse to work or to support their kids when they are perfectly able. Step's husband was treated horribly and all he EVER tried to do was what was best for his kids - and all bio ever tried to do was use and hurt them, in my opinion. I don't understand Ohio's system, because I know fathers who were treated like KINGS by child support when they even admitted in court that they were earning a lot of $$ under the table so they didn't have to pay child support. </p><p></p><p>I am so sorry you are having this problem. It is just so wrong. I have known a LOT of guys who work under the table, get friends to "own" cars and property that the father uses and pays for and owns just so that the father won't have to pay support.</p><p></p><p>In some states you CAN go after the non-supporting parent's EMPLOYER for not making them pay. It might get him fired, but if he won't pay anyway, so what? Yes, that is mean, but you ahve to do what you have to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="susiestar, post: 502612, member: 1233"] I know many are hesitant to seek out private firms who will enforce child support, but they ARE an option. They take an amount of the BACK support owed but they also make SURE that support is kept current. I know a few people who went that route because they figured they were NEVER going to see a penny of any support so if the private company could get anything it was better than nothing. They all seemed to have a good experience and did not begrudge the amt they paid the company - I think it was 30%. As one friend said, 30% of nothing is nothing, and so is 70% of nothing. I at least get that 70% and it is a heck of a lot more than I had before. I am NOT saying that you need to do this, just that it is an option. I think men who do not pay child support are scum. NOT men who are disabled and CANNOT, but men who hide their assets and refuse to work or to support their kids when they are perfectly able. Step's husband was treated horribly and all he EVER tried to do was what was best for his kids - and all bio ever tried to do was use and hurt them, in my opinion. I don't understand Ohio's system, because I know fathers who were treated like KINGS by child support when they even admitted in court that they were earning a lot of $$ under the table so they didn't have to pay child support. I am so sorry you are having this problem. It is just so wrong. I have known a LOT of guys who work under the table, get friends to "own" cars and property that the father uses and pays for and owns just so that the father won't have to pay support. In some states you CAN go after the non-supporting parent's EMPLOYER for not making them pay. It might get him fired, but if he won't pay anyway, so what? Yes, that is mean, but you ahve to do what you have to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
Spent all day at DHR
Top