Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Parent Emeritus
The Sound of Silence / Reading Between the Lines
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hound dog" data-source="post: 402459" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>Yeah I agree the docs determining that it's noncancerous just via ultrasound doesn't sound quite right. I know ultrasound tech has come a long way.......but seriously I've never known them not to at the very least to do a biopsy. The way it sort of fizzled.........and the fact that not once did she ever mention this lump before.........Makes me wonder if the whole story wasn't a lie for attention or sympathy or both. And most docs I know will remove a lump that is causing physical discomfort. It's just not that big of a deal.</p><p></p><p>Katie likes to make stuff up.......especially if it prevents her from having to do things and may gain her sympathy. So who knows?</p><p></p><p>And yeah. Based on past behavior..........Yes, I can see katie and M just sitting there making excuses until the shelter tosses them out. </p><p></p><p>Janet this is supposed to be an old felony charge......like 1994 or so........and it matches with what Nichole's boyfriend has pop up when he does the background check. I understand why HUD has the rule, I really do. But honestly......I think they should also look at if there have been any recent criminal behavior, and what sort of charges it was before just lumping them all together. We as a society SAY we want to rehabilitate inmates........but in the rare case that someone works hard to turn their lives around no one wants to give them a break be it a job or housing. And these ex-inmates need to work and have a place to live just like everyone else. ugh</p><p></p><p>I have an even sneakier suspicion that Katie is withdrawing from contact because she's attempting to convince the pastor that works at the shelter that they have no family support.........maybe in an attempt to fund their trip back to Mo or whatever. She did this last time when she was playing the same game with her babysitter, her welfare caseworker, and several other people the last time she was here.........telling them that we refused to do anything to help her or the kids when we were buying all their clothing ect. All those people were NOT pleased to discover they were conned.</p><p></p><p>I have no clue if she has the kids or not. I've not been contacted by anyone. And two weeks ago when I spoke to her on the phone I know she had them because I could hear them in the background.</p><p></p><p>Guess for now we sit in a holding pattern. ugh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hound dog, post: 402459, member: 84"] Yeah I agree the docs determining that it's noncancerous just via ultrasound doesn't sound quite right. I know ultrasound tech has come a long way.......but seriously I've never known them not to at the very least to do a biopsy. The way it sort of fizzled.........and the fact that not once did she ever mention this lump before.........Makes me wonder if the whole story wasn't a lie for attention or sympathy or both. And most docs I know will remove a lump that is causing physical discomfort. It's just not that big of a deal. Katie likes to make stuff up.......especially if it prevents her from having to do things and may gain her sympathy. So who knows? And yeah. Based on past behavior..........Yes, I can see katie and M just sitting there making excuses until the shelter tosses them out. Janet this is supposed to be an old felony charge......like 1994 or so........and it matches with what Nichole's boyfriend has pop up when he does the background check. I understand why HUD has the rule, I really do. But honestly......I think they should also look at if there have been any recent criminal behavior, and what sort of charges it was before just lumping them all together. We as a society SAY we want to rehabilitate inmates........but in the rare case that someone works hard to turn their lives around no one wants to give them a break be it a job or housing. And these ex-inmates need to work and have a place to live just like everyone else. ugh I have an even sneakier suspicion that Katie is withdrawing from contact because she's attempting to convince the pastor that works at the shelter that they have no family support.........maybe in an attempt to fund their trip back to Mo or whatever. She did this last time when she was playing the same game with her babysitter, her welfare caseworker, and several other people the last time she was here.........telling them that we refused to do anything to help her or the kids when we were buying all their clothing ect. All those people were NOT pleased to discover they were conned. I have no clue if she has the kids or not. I've not been contacted by anyone. And two weeks ago when I spoke to her on the phone I know she had them because I could hear them in the background. Guess for now we sit in a holding pattern. ugh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
Parent Emeritus
The Sound of Silence / Reading Between the Lines
Top