Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Three strikes .... I'm out
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JJJ" data-source="post: 406214" data-attributes="member: 1169"><p>Current safety plan is enhanced eyes-on supervision. She had permission to go get water which necessitated her being out of staff's eyesight briefly. Staff thought that the boys had left and that the area near the sink was empty. Staff needs to buy a clue. Once again, I had warned them 2 weeks ago that I sensed she was planning something but since I couldn't give details and she explained away the things that made me suspicious...she had gotten a Program Violation last week for a "miscommunication" i going with a staff member to place A when she was suppose to be at place B -- testing the waters in my humble opinion.</p><p></p><p>husband wants to withdraw our consent for her to participate in co-ed sports. I want to change her 'eye-sight' supervision to 'arms reach' supervision whenever she is outside the all-girls classroom or unit and strict eyesight in those places. husband wants to block her from attending prom in may; I suggested that we not do that but that we insist on a 1:1 staff assigned to her and required to stay within 5' of her at all times. husband is concerned that in a darkened, crowded room, Kanga could, well, get very busy. </p><p></p><p>I was blunt with staff and told them had they not heard the boys staff coming back into the room that it would have gone much, much farther than the alleged "kissing". Staff was a bit subdued and agreed. This is the same staff that I met with last month and made sure that she understood the importance of the safety plan and not getting lulled into a false sense of security. Yep, glad that helped.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JJJ, post: 406214, member: 1169"] Current safety plan is enhanced eyes-on supervision. She had permission to go get water which necessitated her being out of staff's eyesight briefly. Staff thought that the boys had left and that the area near the sink was empty. Staff needs to buy a clue. Once again, I had warned them 2 weeks ago that I sensed she was planning something but since I couldn't give details and she explained away the things that made me suspicious...she had gotten a Program Violation last week for a "miscommunication" i going with a staff member to place A when she was suppose to be at place B -- testing the waters in my humble opinion. husband wants to withdraw our consent for her to participate in co-ed sports. I want to change her 'eye-sight' supervision to 'arms reach' supervision whenever she is outside the all-girls classroom or unit and strict eyesight in those places. husband wants to block her from attending prom in may; I suggested that we not do that but that we insist on a 1:1 staff assigned to her and required to stay within 5' of her at all times. husband is concerned that in a darkened, crowded room, Kanga could, well, get very busy. I was blunt with staff and told them had they not heard the boys staff coming back into the room that it would have gone much, much farther than the alleged "kissing". Staff was a bit subdued and agreed. This is the same staff that I met with last month and made sure that she understood the importance of the safety plan and not getting lulled into a false sense of security. Yep, glad that helped. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Three strikes .... I'm out
Top