Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
What, if anything, could he be charged with?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="witzend" data-source="post: 209222" data-attributes="member: 99"><p>It could be providing false information. I know that there are a number of prisoners in our jails who are "AKA's" because they give false names when they are arrested, and that is what they are charged under. There used to be people who got off because they had named the wrong person in the charge. The laws here have been changed to allow that "this particular crime" was committed by "that particular human", usually identified by the fingerprints. Their name is irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>I'm not quite remembering the situation as to why he is avoiding the in-laws because of this. Is it that the think he did it himself, or is the nephew related somehow? My in-laws wouldn't even know my neices if I explained it to them. </p><p></p><p>If it's an issue with the in-laws for some reason, would probably just tell them point blank before someone was wondering why I hadn't said something about it. <em>Everyone</em> understands rotten relatives who do rotten things, like your nephew. It doesn't make anyone other than the nephew rotten. But maybe I'm missing a piece of the picture?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="witzend, post: 209222, member: 99"] It could be providing false information. I know that there are a number of prisoners in our jails who are "AKA's" because they give false names when they are arrested, and that is what they are charged under. There used to be people who got off because they had named the wrong person in the charge. The laws here have been changed to allow that "this particular crime" was committed by "that particular human", usually identified by the fingerprints. Their name is irrelevant. I'm not quite remembering the situation as to why he is avoiding the in-laws because of this. Is it that the think he did it himself, or is the nephew related somehow? My in-laws wouldn't even know my neices if I explained it to them. If it's an issue with the in-laws for some reason, would probably just tell them point blank before someone was wondering why I hadn't said something about it. [I]Everyone[/I] understands rotten relatives who do rotten things, like your nephew. It doesn't make anyone other than the nephew rotten. But maybe I'm missing a piece of the picture? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
What, if anything, could he be charged with?
Top